• ojmcelderry@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They can still reject the proposal. Just because they’re built upon Chromium, doesn’t mean they need to utilise or retain every feature Google adds to it.

      • NightOwl@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        For sites that fully embrace the new web environment integrity procedure would that break chromium browsers like Brave too?

          • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            That is semantics that wont help the users. They still need to change browser to access their banks website if their bank is enforcing WEI. There is nothing “broken” in the technical sense, the website and browser will be incompatible with oneanother. The blame is clearly on the bank but what’s a single user gonna do if this becomes industry standard for banks?

            (I am using banks as an example of a service you cant easily avoid, this would also be true for other important stuff like digitialized government access etc ect)