• ChaoticNeutralCzech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    But then the profits stay in America.

    If they really cared about safety, they would mandate open or at least independently audited source code.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      But then the profits stay in America.

      Setting aside the point that there’s no reason that it’d be more profitable to do work domestically, there’s no general restriction on overseas software production. This is specific to China.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Banning something Chinese is easier to wrap in the “national security” narrative even if that’s not the real reason.

    • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The proposed legislation would make it easier to mandate an audit on code in the future. The US can’t enforce laws on other countries. China is probably the only large car producer that would sell cars in the US and resit such an audit.

      If China makes dangerous self driving cars, they will be very difficult to investigate.