Reading you comment I searched for the differences between being “not guilty” and being “innocent” and boy I didn’t know enough about the US justice system. I thought a “not guilty” verdict was the same as “the guy didn’t do it”. I stand corrected, though. Thanks for your input.

Where does the judge say that evidence was insufficient for a verdict? I missed that part.

Also, are we going to start questioning every verdict as if any accusation was true, even when proved differently in court?