Even better, they’re just executing the rules. They’re just the messenger here.

It’s more like, “Here’s the specific passage in the rules which clearly states that you’re being an absolute wanker, now go on and play with your cars. Leave the cash.”

The first example that my brain came up with was definitely Popsicle Toes, and not any children’s song :P

I think this might be a “yes, but no” kind of thing.

Yes, these are test strips. Yes, they change color to indicate a reading. Yes, they use chemical reactions to cause that color change.

AFAIK: No, these aren’t for testing blood. No, these don’t seem to be for consumption by an electronic meter. And no, I don’t think this is what OP was asking about.

Like, there’s probably some good info, but not for this thread specifically :P

Source: Pulling it straight out of my ass, but it is informed by my limited experience with medical test equipment, and much less limited experience with electronics.

…again

WAT.

The AI doesnt understand the former, only the latter.

Do you possibly mean “The AI evangelists” or something similar?

Like, I could totally understand it in the “software will also include the biases of those who wrote it” kind of way (a la Amazon’s failed attempt at automating job candidate search). If the only incentive you’re given as a programmer is “make it make money”, then yeah, your AI is going to bias towards that end.

Just couldn’t tell on first reading

You don’t need to break a system to make it broken, just never maintain it and it’ll break itself!

See: Insurance companies

GUYS GUYS!! If we call their characters gay, we get sick bonus art!!!

GAY GAY HOMOSEXUAL GAY OMG SO GAY SO BEAUTIFULLY WONDERFULLY GAYYYYYYYYYY