![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/81eca92d-b54b-4252-8ddc-c2394cdd05ca.jpeg)
I’m personally working on this problem. It sucks, and the politics are frustrating as hell, but the people working at the State of CO to reign in oil and gas are making every penny of funding work as hard as it can.
I’m personally working on this problem. It sucks, and the politics are frustrating as hell, but the people working at the State of CO to reign in oil and gas are making every penny of funding work as hard as it can.
Futo’s and Rossman’s responses don’t make their goals any clearer to me. Sure, they’ve avoided the issue by not using “open source” now, but why all this mess in the first place?
They’re worried about developers of open-source software not getting paid? Then pay them to develop it (looks like they’re doing that already, so great!). So why then keep bringing up that developers need to be paid, if they’re paying them? Royalties?
Annoyed that big tech is taking open-source code and not giving back? Why not use a copyleft license? You can always dual license. Problem solved. Why make a new Frankenstein license that tries to do both, but just looks like it sucks at everything?
I honestly don’t really know. I know that The Environmental Defense Fund and The Clean Air Task Force have a strong presence in the state, so it may be worth donating or volunteering for them.