the US to say anything? We do the same thing with our Criminal laws

… and don’t acknowledge the ICC and host indicted war criminals / Netanjahu. The president is also banking his annexation plans on the ICC not enforcing indictments in his case. And I believe I read that the agenda of Netanjahu’s next visit to the US openly includes action to undermine the ICC, so it’s indeed right wing authoritarians conspiring against accountability.

A resolute response is too tedious for the president, who apparently can’t even honor the own soldiers - golfing schedule conflicts.

I use Ente Auth, open source 2FA authenticator, with E2EE backup (which makes it nicely multi -device useable)

Removed by mod

They probably also believe in US exceptionalism 😆🎊

Hvis man tænker invasionsscenariet lidt videre, bliver angriberen jo straks en krigsforbryder, og ICC ser ud til at fungere ret godt for mig. For selvudnævnte tidligere aspiranter til Nobels fredspris er dette måske for vild en udvikling, og det ville kræve en del disciplin (at blive i et land, der ikke anerkender ICC, “heldigvis” hjemlandet) for ikke at ende i en celle.

I wonder who would buy used Tesla’s with the failure rate found during the 1st inspection interval by Danish bilsyn: 23%, 15% Model 3 and S respectively. It seems they simply aren’t engineered for longevity. https://fdm.dk/nyheder/nyt-om-biler/2025-02-danske-synstal-se-de-ekstreme-dumpeprocenter-20-elbiler

It will get difficult for the parties not understanding the concept of “law and order” to accept that markets are very well positioned to set the rules of engagement. You can select to play by those rules or not offer your service in that market but somewhere else (or scream your victim complex to your audience)

In my opinion, the advantages of these platforms will far outweigh the disadvantages - provided that the abuse of power can be curbed (opaque algorithms that present fringe positions to a large audience, censorship by the owner, etc.). Regulatory measures are needed for all actors: rules for algorithm transparency, audits. If disclosure or audit fails, platforms can continue to be accessible but must shut down algorithms.

It will be a steep learning curve to realize that owning and citing from a book (let’s say the art of the deal) doesn’t mean that the enormous effort that previous world leaders put into brokering peace agreements was because they were stupid or lazy. Unfortunately, predictably, “bullying everyone and everything” will not work, but putting the ball so clearly in Russia’s court is actually good progress.

I use calendar.online and it worked very good for my purposes, nice intuitive UI

I’m eager to see how the clown expects to ever be trusted again - randomly cancelling his own and ages old treaties at will or using threats to do so for “negotiations” (not to speak threats of annexation of former allies), what’s left for positive diplomacy once he comes to see he needs it?

🤡

… and it’s great to get it on to Fox News to reach their clients. There’s increasing suffering among them and at some point people will join the protesters.

Would be great indeed but I fear there won’t be"that moment where he realizes …". In his view he’s doing everything right for his audience (grifter in chief, Putin, billionaires). Nevertheless “chapeau!” to the protesters, well framed in the ski resort setting - always to remind the amount of taxpayer paid relaxation while others suffer from their actions.

Congrats! It’s amazing how Ukraine is keeping up and innovating warfare with their home developed weapons (not certain if that applies here but truly amazing to me!). A lot to learn for Europe defense.