I do think they have a point: there’s not many other engines I can think of that are quite as ‘tangible’ as theirs. Every object has its physical place in the world and can be picked up, manipulated,… in a way that’s unlike other engines where the world just feels more static.
I dab too, there are dozens of us!
We have this in Europe for new cars, and the issue everyone expects is that cars are terrible at accurately knowing the speed limit. Current cars often can already show what they think the speed limit is, but it’s often inaccurate due to missing a sign or road crossing, or any other software/image recognition problems. Which means you’re bound to get false positives, causing drivers to turn off the warnings each time.
The only upside is that we might get another epically long Milo Rossi debunking
That honestly seems pretty low for friend.com
Although the fact they’re developing hardware on less than a million dollar budget is bananas, let alone the other whack ideas
On the other hand, those coalition talks can take months or longer with the old government continuing to run things for sometimes over a year after the elections. Looking at you, Belgium
Oh, that’s not even showing as a missing character, to me it just looks like 0.9
At least we agree 0.99… = 1
0.9 is most definitely not equal to 1
As long as they don’t start building tunnels under their house because they’re an ‘engineer’…
I’m just an outsider, but it seems to me that in 2016, many people on the left/anarchist /socialist/liberal whatever weren’t enthusiastic about Clinton and didn’t vote or voted third party. This led to Trump winning and subsequently nominate enough Supreme Court justices to set back abortion rights 50 years among many other things that probably are worse than whatever Clinton could have done.
You can express your preferences in primaries, local elections, in movements to change voting laws, but once candidates in a first past the post system are locked in, it’s intentional ignorance to pretend like it won’t be one of the two major party candidates that will win, and not voting for one helps the other one. If you’re okay with that, fine, but don’t pretend that not voting is a neutral act. You’re giving away your voice to whoever is voting one of the two major candidates, and I assure you the right does not care about their candidate’s past or unsavory aspects.
Nah, base 12 number system with the same logic as metric. But it’s probably too late to switch to a different number system.
I’ve got all my knowledge from random tiktoks on my for you page, so pray for me😬
Do you think I need to play the first 2 before this one?
It’s a reverse DeSantis