It’s my primary but Google unfortunately is often a fallback. And Google is tracking the shit out of us these days. Certain obscure searches don’t work well on DDG, sad to say.

MAGA-level conversation.

There’s an absolutely ancient meme of someone selling a mirror or TV or something. Circa 2000 ish.

It’s not a hobby. It’s not subjective. Something is either good or bad, in total (some real number value on that axis, to be specific). The kind of thing you said is literally a cop-out of confronting that. The need to put some “ist”/“ism” label on it just avoids dealing with the question entirely. That’s not the definition of pacifism, what I said is the framework to situationally decide whether pacifism or something else is more ethical.

WTF is with the asinine left/right meter at the bottom of the article?

The mentality where you think people “deserve” things, I think it’s just irrational. If your goal in politics is to do best by all, then you’re working against your goal. If that’s not your goal, then it should be. Wishing harm on anyone is literally a last resort when there is no preferable option and where more good comes out of that harm than bad - otherwise it’s an ethical negative. It’s alarming to me how few people seem to have thought through that logic.

Not true, they also ran on supporting genocide and deporting immigrants.

Facts

Fuck the TSA and everyone that works there though, abolish the TSA.

Sounded like you were saying decrease tip % on account of price %. What you wrote is ambiguous I see. Could also be interpreted as “I tip 15% now and the tip percent should not increase.”

The facade of having souls to their supporters is the only thing holding them back.

…the candidate the population votes for.

Man, Corel Linux looks like a vibe. The box looks familiar but don’t think I ever used it.

Brainwashers and brainwashees. Brainwashers are traitors.

Paul also pulled out of his ass all the insane bullshit that modern evangelical Christianity is based around. “Yeah, uh, God hates gays, and women, and also loves the Roman Empire that killed Jesus.”

Guy’s dead, no evidence either way, so asserting that’s wrong is about as baseless as asserting it’s right. Things like that are far from unheard of.

Because all their living expenses also increased

At the same time, “what the population votes for is what the population gets” ignores that we are often only presented with crappy options to start with.

It does not ignore that, rather it explicitly takes that into account.

The caveat to my statement would ONLY be “so long as we’re using this system.”

Please focus more on accurate logic.

Now this fucking guy is on .ml too?

We had Hitler under control! Everything was going according to plan!