Maybe my pig will shit out a gold nugget.

Our legal system is a continuation of the English common law system of the American colonies.

The magna carta falls within English legal history and is widely viewed as the first step in regulating the behavior of the king.

This supreme court ruling seems to allow the President to break the law.

It’s my own comparison, but I think it’s quite good.

I could also say that they’ve made the presidency into a dictatorship (in the Roman usage of the word). That’s actually unfair to dictators since their unlimited power was narrow in scope, and they could be prosecuted when they left office. Ceasar was the last Roman dictator.

Supreme court ruled that presidents are immune from obeying the law.

Basically, they went against a millennium of legal precedent and overturned the magna carta.

Thank you.

I haven’t heard Hon used that way since 2006.

Is it still actually a thing?

Four years ago, I voted for President Harris as the lesser of two evils.

This year, I vote for Queen Kamala I, as the lesser of two evils.

Cool. No disagreement.

I feel that “normalizing assault” might paint an inaccurate picture of what the article contains.

I, a trans woman living in the American South, am already living under the sword of damoclese when it comes to the threat of unprovoked physical assault. I personally prefer not to add onto this stress with misconceptions.

Did the article mention assault?

What portion of the electromagnetic field is produced by the display?

Do these pens work with tablets that have ePaper displays?

(no experience with these pens; STEM nerd popping in from the main page. I was only aware of styluses <stylusi? styli? styleese?> and battery pens)

Hey! You read all of my comment this time. Thank you for extending the bare minimum of effort. In return, I’ll read your comments; It’s a reciprocal relationship.

So, in your view, elections change nothing and we’re all sheeple. True change will occur during the revolution; elections have no consequences. Answer me this:

For a trans woman, living in the American South, would another Trump presidency lower quality of life for her, raise it, or would it stay roughly the same?

K. You don’t read all of my short reply then I don’t read past the first sentence of your long winded reply.

You’re not a serious person.

Two serial murderers, one with a higher body count and is also a pedophile, rapist, con man, national security threat, insurrectionist, and convicted felon.

And at that point, it’s not an analogy any more.

So in your reality, what happens?

Seriously, what are you hoping to gain? What’s the desired effect?

The progressive faction just… never votes. What happens? Magic? Revolution?

You’re the sane one, so tell me.

something something atmospheric pressure something something

Hmm…

I’m not part of the drag scene, but my understanding is that drag is an exaggerated performance of gender.

The actual situation of the actor doesn’t really factor into whether or not it’s drag. It’s also not exclusively an exaggerated performance of femininity.

I reckon I could carry those bricks.

So Congress has one man, with a particular set of skills, tasked with apprehending targets and bringing them to the House floor.

Sounds like a movie idea.

If we’re in the business of blocking/absorbing signals instead of reflecting them, apparently cesium bromide is a solid choice.

https://www.photonics.com/Articles/Common_Infrared_Optical_Materials_and_Coatings_A/a25495