![](https://lemmy.my-box.dev/pictrs/image/238bb7ef-8e89-44cb-9bc9-1560c98a9b3a.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Who knows, maybe it’ll teach people to be more skeptical of the things they read online, and actually look for the underlying sources.
Who knows, maybe it’ll teach people to be more skeptical of the things they read online, and actually look for the underlying sources.
so that corporations can make a few easier dollars before this whole planet burns in flames?
Sure. But they do that by providing services. Services like Gmail and (probably for a large part) cloud hosting for other companies, companies whose services you’re probably using as well.
And honestly, it usually is more economical (Both financially as well as in eco footprint) for those companies to use cloud services that scale based on demand, rather than having a fixed set of servers running for the potential max capacity.
Don’t get me wrong, increased carbon emissions is bad, but the picture is a bit more nuanced than “Google flip switch, kill animals, get money”.
The AI hype (talk to your toaster!) will blow over, useful AI will remain and improve, this is just a hurdle along the way.
But why wouldn’t those same limits not apply to biological controllers? A neuron is basically a transistor.
Because people don’t read articles, and this way OP can still get the rage-engagement
In a way, that’s what I’m contributing to now as well. So that’s why I’m not even going to
I’d wager the main reason we can’t prove or disprove that, is because we have no strict definition of intelligence or sentience to begin with.
For that matter, computers have many more transistors and are already capable of mimicking human emotions - how ethical is that, and why does it differ from bio-based controllers?
The line has been changed to be gender neutral 9 hours ago. Victory!
Oh my. Sometimes Betteridge’s law of headlines is wrong.
I was about to mention this example. It’s everything you love about mythbusters (doing crazy science experiments), without everything you hate about mythbusters and what made me stop watching. No more constant hopping over between the different myths per episode, or tons of recaps.
Just myths, one at a time, no bullshit.
You, me, a few other people.
Ah, yes, I do.
At least this is opt-in, and Firefox still allows for manifest v3 extensions, and, on the whole, isn’t using a engine funded by a billion dollar company that’s doing everything in it’s power to spy on you.
As someone who worked on a couple of video encoding / streaming services, this was an amazingly interesting read. Some personal highlights:
It’s unused, you can go ahead and kill it.
With these kind of titles, I hope you will, and know you won’t.
How it’s handled in countries such as Norway or The Netherlands is that those kinds of classes are exempt from the ban. It’s not a hard issue to solve.
If you’re more worried about your kid at school getting shot than them getting distracted during their education, You might be the one living in a shit hole country.
In one instance, AI Overviews told a user to use glue on pizza to make sure the cheese won’t slide off (pssst…please don’t do this.)
If you need these kind of tips, on behalf of the gene pool, please don’t procreate, and eat as much glue as you can.
I never said better than the average driver, I said better than human drivers (preferably by a long shot).
So let’s say that means… Better than 90% of all drivers. That isn’t going to cost lives, it’s going to save them. Not to mention improve traffic flow.
Well, just a month ago they couldn’t pay out a bounty to Kaspersky for a 0day exploit they found due to the sanctions, so this seems a little off.