That makes sense if you believe Biden is the only one who can beat Trump.

The all the polls say he won’t.

But even if Biden is the chosen one and beats Trump, he can’t run in 2028 while Trump surely will. What then? Biden was our only hope, and he’s not an option anymore.

No. This idea of Biden or bust is wrong. I’m sure lots of people could beat Trump. They’d just do it by embracing progressive populism against conservative populism. But the Democratic elite are very much against that.

That’s because, Progressive populism is very much against the ownership class, which both parties depend on. Conservative populism on the other hand, is largely a tool of the ownership class.

65million was the number I learned as a kid born in 1980.

Sometimes terrible people can do good things.
Those good things should be supported.
Judge a project on it own merits.

People still use the Autobahn.

I live in Albuquerque NM. I remember when we tried to buy a bunch of BYDs electric busses a few years ago.

They were nothing but problems apparently. Batteries were to small, couldn’t run a full day. Breaks weren’t good enough to stop in a reasonable distance. Oh and the doors would open spontaneously, while driving, with out being able to be closed.

The city canceled the rest of the order, and never put them into service.

Our comments right here on the Fediverse, are a good example.
Lemmy, Mastodon, Pixelfed, PeerTube, and numerous others, all use the same open communication standard; Offering very different services and experiences.

Collabra seems close. They do use ODF. And you can host you’re own server.
But they don’t seem to use E2EE. And the collaborative aspect doesn’t apear to be an open standard you can use with different software packages.

Is there an open standard for encrypted asynchronous colabreative document creation and editing?

The road structure is very flexible. You can add public transit to almost any road or street.

My only complaint is that pedestrian only roads are the same size as roads with 2 lanes each way.

The web app works on your phone and tablet, yes?

He said unconditional cash grants deterred people from working and reaping the benefits of success.

Just like the wealthy people who keep working after they’ve made enough to live the rest of their life on the interest.

Both can be true.
In fact the former could even be caused by the latter.

Small quantities of BVO are used legally in some citrus-flavored drinks in the United States to keep the flavor evenly distributed.

No, you’ll just have to shake it before drinking.

Number 1 has issues.

Yes wage growth in 2023 was higher than inflation by a margin of 1.3%. That fails to take into account the 7% and 6.5% inflation of '21 and '22. So people are still way behind in recent years.

Also, while by income rates, “Gen Z are now wealthier than any previous generation.” That doesn’t include the drastic increase in housing costs. So while they do have more money, more still have to live with their parents, and delay starting their own separate life, than previous generations. Even that extra money isn’t enough.

Ah! I didn’t realize that. Then it might derail that conviction.

Thought it would still be a big lift to determine it was an official act as POTUS.

Yes I know that’s what they’re talking about. And this SCOTUS ruling doesn’t effect that case at all.

This case was brought to SCOTUS by Trumps Jan6 lawers. It only matters to things done while in office.

The bribery case, the falsified documents case, aren’t at all effected by this ruling.

No, that’s not at all what they did.
All those things happened before he was president. None of it would count.

This ruling is about his January 6th trial, and the Georgia election interference trial.

That is me. Numerous people have called me “The most literal person I know”.

I wrote only exactly what I meant.

I would TALK to her about looking for someplace to live she does feel safe.

And literally… Advocating Talking about something, is not advocating Doing that thing.

Have you ever been in a TV studio with all the lights pointed at you?
That’s exactly what they are. Directed-Energy Weapons.

“She not gaslighting” was the first paragraph.

Looking back I don’t see anything I wrote, that says they should move, or anything about abuse at all.

My second paragraph recommended a conversation. One which I’m sure would illuminate more of her thoughts; Possibly exposing inconsistencies in her logic, if she is genuinely being manipulative and abusive.

Or possibly we’re both wrong, and reading things that aren’t actually written. You’ve certainly proven a tendency for that with what I’ve written.

Sure all of that is true. But also outside the scope of the direct question.