Ein Ethik-Doktor würde alles mit tausend Bedenken noch zehn Jahre verschleppen. Der hierzulande typische Skeptizismus gegenüber Computern ist so schon schlimm genug.

A trailer is more flexible than a dedicated cargo bike and cheaper.

The short duration is also an advantage. Meth is much more of time commitment.

Legalization also requires regulation. Restrictions on advertisement and sales would be sensible.

The quality levels can be quite different though. If legalized there would also be a market for organic fair trade cocaine and similar marketing techniques.

Or drinks and candy laced with cocaine, cocoa leaf tea, and so on.

Er lässt seine anderen Tätigkeiten ruhen, hat Merz bei der Vorstellung gesagt. Frau Reiche ebenfalls.

Digitalminister ist vielversprechend. Er hat einen Abschluss in Computational Physics, kann also modellieren und programmieren.

Frauenquote ist auch ziemlich gut.

One trip with a cargo bike or bicycle trailer.

A centralized platform providing infrastructure could be financed using a tax on every internet subscription.

Someone saying transwomen exist and deserve equal rights to women is not exactly an extremely transphobic position to hold.

That’s a progressive view overall still. Take all the allies you can get. Competitions in ideological purity and playing political commissar only serve to divide.

We live in a time now where equal rights for transwomen and women are under attack.

Rights and identities are not the same thing or equally important.

What many people consider a „real woman“ or „real man“ varies and often excludes cisgender people.

That said, I totally understand that Blahaj defederated and has a more strict stance.

!nosurf@lemmy.ca

Enpass works well for me.

At least you’re wearing clothes.

First I have to a banana on my ear.

That choice of word was no accident. It’s Holocaust (Shoa) relativism at the very least, bordering on denial. It’s antisemitic plain and simple. No other reason to use this word here.

Zionism is simply nationalism of the Jewish people, self determination in their homeland.

Palestinian nationalism is also nationalism for self determination in their homeland.

The solution is not the obliteration of the other, but to divide or share the land.

Antisemitism is always hate against Jews. That’s what this term was introduced for originally and all it ever meant.

Israel‘s existence is legal. It’s based on international law backed by the League of Nations and the United Nations. Israel is recognized by 85% of countries worldwide, a number which only goes up.

Calling for the ethnic cleansing of half of the world’s Jews from their ancestral homeland is of course blatant antisemitism.

10% of Israelis have a second passport.

The majority of Israeli Jews have ancestry from the Middle East. They fled from the whole of the Middle East to the only place safe for them. These people can’t go „back“.

The Jews are going nowhere, because they have nowhere to go. This isn’t French Algeria.

You want people whose parents were born and raised in Israel to be replaced by people whose parents were born and raised outside Palestine.

Your statement proves exactly why Israel needs to exist and why there’s no partner for peace.

Your attitude has only lead to decades of violence and suffering for Palestinians. It ensures nothing will get better for them. Clinging to the delusion of Israel just vanishing some day is what has kept this conflict fueled to this day.

For you any number of dead Palestinians are acceptable as long as Israel is somewhat inconvenienced. The more Palestinians die, the more your hate is justified. That’s why you advocate for the course of action that will lead to their deaths.

There’s nothing pro Palestinian in your message, only hate against Israel. Sadly that’s what a large part of the so-called pro Palestine movement has come to today. Improving their living conditions and building a future for them in peace, coexistence, and prosperity is of no interest to you. It’s snd ideology of hate and death.

Ada‘s post contains no details or reasoning. Linking to the offending content would make this appear more deliberate.

The offending content was apparently this.

A woman is an adult female. A transwoman is an adult female who used to be male. It’s not difficult to grasp that they are different things. You can admit that and still believe that transwomen should be treated with dignity like anyone else.

Personally I don’t give a shit what bathroom people use or what they want to be referred to. I’ll go along with whatever… But a woman and a transwoman are different things, and it’s disingenuous to pretend otherwise. Always have been different things and always will be, no matter what the law states, now or in the future.

Kier’s words are still not transphobia. There is no fear, dislike, prejudice, discrimination, harassment, or violence in his statement. The scream of ‘transphobia’ is thrown around too much for anyone who disagrees with a narrow definition. Any disagreement is labelled as hate, and it’s silly.

Should a transwoman have the same rights and respect and opportunity as a woman (as per the legal definition)? Absolutely. Are they the same? No, they are not. Is that a hateful bigoted viewpoint worthy of scorn? I don’t believe so.

I don’t use the term cis. I use the term woman and you knew exactly what I meant. A blonde woman is a description of a woman’s hair colour and is a semantic-based response that is nothing to do with this point. You know this; it’s a foolish riposte that’s nothing at all to do with the clear and simple fact that a woman who used to be a man is not the same thing as a (cis) woman.

I can call it a woman who used to have a penis or a woman who used to be a man if you want me to be pedantic about it. Nothing to do with hair colour, or skin colour, or anything else except previously being a biological male and now identifying as a woman.

‘adult human female’ is not a dog whistle. It’s a legal and common-sense definition that you clearly understand but are trying to make out to be hate for some reason. I am not denying the legitimacy of transwomen; nor is Keir.

Transwomen and (cis) women are different things. And Transmen and (cis) men are different things. They have different names, which you yourself use for a reason. That reason being they are not the same thing. This is exactly the same as saying transwomen are not women, because they are not. They are transwomen.

It’s pretty simple.

Copied from here

Wer ist der sympathische Mann?

Im missing flags for Nazi Germany, Trizonesien, and Holy Roman Empire.