![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
I don’t disagree that their priorities are wrong, but this is not an aberration, this is the norm (and that norm should change)
I don’t disagree that their priorities are wrong, but this is not an aberration, this is the norm (and that norm should change)
What? You didn’t get to rule on a case solely based on your fucking betting pool.
This is exactly how injunctions work. It’s a combination of “how likely is the party asking for the injunction to win” and “how much damage will be done if the injunction is not granted”. It’s the same logic used to block abortion laws from going into effect and things like Trump’s gag order being enforced, while those actual cases work their way through the courts.
I REMEMBER when the ILLEGITIMATE SO-CALLED “PRESIDENT” sent his JACK BOOTED THUGS to ATTACK his political opponents - TRUE AMERICANS! - all so he could VIRTUE SIGNAL!
FTFY (translated to MAGA)
^(I do think that Trump was legitimately elected, but a system that lets the person who did not win the popular vote win the election is still bullshit)^
Why not just not use the switch function? You can even “disable” the switch in Home Assistant so you can’t accidentally turn it off, and most of these sorts of switches have a setting for default (on power restoration after power loss) of on or off.