Ich hab vor nem Monat mitgekriegt, dass feddit.org existiert, und bin zu dem Schluss gekommen, dass die Daten von feddit.de nicht mehr verfügbar sind. (Lasse mich aber gerne eines Besseren belehren.)

(Und jetzt muss ich mich als Neubiene beschimpfen lassen, welch Schmach)

I assume what you’re implying is that you can’t put a tent there. Okay, why not fucking say that then? Homeless people around here rarely use tents, for reasons that I do not know because I am privileged enough to not be homeless, and they could probably just arrange their stuff around those shapes, put their mattress between them and go to sleep - which is why “tent” isn’t the first thing that popped into my head.

Thank you for making me jump through hoops to understand a thing.

Right? It looks like there was an attempt (gold star) at hostility but they still wanted it to look somewhat aesthetically pleasing and mostly forgot about the hostile part? Or maybe I’m just not seeing most of the hostile part, that’s what I’m trying to figure out.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m going to watch this the second I can get my hook on it but I’d really prefer (and would pay for) a decent MotU movie, even if it’s “just” good weird.

lol yeah, don’t worry, bit of confusion helps keep the brain agile. Very interesting video, thanks for sharing!

It’s hard to believe you’re not trolling.

I swear I’m not. It’s entirely possible that I’m being slow, but I’m really just trying to understand so I can identify these things better in the future. Because I seriously don’t get it, there’s still plenty of room to lie down between them?

Oh the browser addon. Goshdarnit. (watching now)

There’s good weird and bad weird. This seems to be going in the bad weird direction.

I feel like we’re talking past each other. I’m wondering how the weird human-shaped things added on top of the vents constitute hostile architecture - how are they meant to to discourage people from sleeping there? This is me trying to learn, I’m very aware that sleeping on vents isn’t exactly comfortable but how do these things make it less so?

Good lord, this looks impossible to keep clean.

The vents are still accessible though? And you have these nifty mannequins to hang your stuff?

Edit: honest question, possibly unnecessary joke.

Doctor Who subscribes more to TNG like episode titles (like Explosion which is about an explosion): Space Babies is about space babies, in The Angels Take Manhattan the angels are in Manhattan, The Meddling Monk is about a monk who meddles, in The End of the World the world ends, in It Takes You Away there is a frog that takes you away, in Boom things go boom.

That anti union propaganda clip towards the end makes me want to vomit and not just from the content but the artificial, patronising way he speaks. Like out of the cheapest 80s dystopian science fiction movie, meant to hammer home that “these are the baddies”.

That’s not very good for your skin, Bru- Batsy.

I apologise for not including a tone indicator, I do try but I keep thinking I’m more obvious than I am. It was genuinely meant as a joke, as in “no, lalalala, go away, I don’t want to hear it”.

Ah, you added context. I fail to see however how you think your title was meant to convey “I thought it would be standard Star Trek, but animated so I was disappointed because my expectation was different”.

“I know how to make myself do the thing I planned to do.”

Ah, good point. Still something OP can find out by experimenting a bit and adjusting the amount where needed.

I know they exist. I’m talking about the expected profile which doesn’t fit in several places, thus, in my humble opinion, not really fitting the use case for surprised pikachu face which implies that everything is as expected and there is nothing of note and nobody should be surprised by any of this.