• Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    That’s kinda how I feel about the majority of adult cartoons outside of shows like King of The Hill that feel more down to Earth in a way and less like a full-on highschool level comedy. I personally don’t like adult animation usually as a rule because of shows like family guy, robot chicken, and such. There are definitely a very small few exceptions like KoTH or Futurama, but in general those types of shows just weren’t made for people like me.

  • Zess@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Sorry you can’t enjoy something if you think it’s childish. Your life must be awful.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’ve never seen a feed of this that doesn’t have the profanity censored out. Is it just always sanitized or am I just not finding the adult version?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I think OP is so sensitive to the profanity that even bleeped is too much.

      And my god is T’Ana hilarious. I mean come on. The whole joke is the bleeping and the fact that she’s literally the only person in all of Star Trek that constantly swears.

  • _NetNomad@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    14 hours ago

    i love lower decks but that’s in spite of and not because of the “adult humor.” the jokes that make me laugh- which is most of them!- would be exactly the same if it was an all ages program on Nickelodeon like Prodigy. the good does ultimately outweigh the bad, and signifigantly so, i just think it was a missed opportunity. i was pretty young when i watched TNG and TOS with my parents and probably would’ve gotten a huge kick out of LD

    apparently tawney newsome is gonna be writing on the starfleet academy show so that might end up being The Best of Both Worlds (Parts I and II) between all-ages trek and funny trek

  • Blackout@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Lower Decks is peak Star Trek. The humor is almost entirely related to previous ST series.

    Is OP a Klingon agent sent to ruin our fun?

  • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    15 hours ago

    You wanted Lower Decks to be more boring? I like a good conference room scene as much as the next Trekkie, but they only had 22 minutes to work with!

  • Wolf314159@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I guess the secondary directive of the Federation is to gatekeep having fun?

    Animation isn’t for children by default. Only boring, unimaginative people talk that way about animated stories.

    Star Trek has always had violence.

    Star Trek has often had profanity. In another alien language sure, but we all knew which Klingon words were curses.

    Does sophomoric humor graduate to senior humor when it’s subtle enough that you didn’t catch it as a child? Humor is SUPER subjective and VERY sensitive to the current zeitgeist, so comparing humor across a franchise that has been around this long seems a little absurd. Data pushed Crusher into the ocean for a laugh, that seems pretty sophomoric to me. Bones regularly joked about Spock’s racial differences, that also seems pretty crude by today’s standards.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Animation isn’t for children by default.

      In fact, early animation was not even thought of to appeal to a particular age group. It was just a fun thing to do with movies that you couldn’t do with live action. And people who did comic strips in newspapers, never intended to be just for kids, were hired to make them.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gertie_the_Dinosaur

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    I think you might be in a minority on your dislike of Lower Decks.

    Also, violence has always been part of Star Trek and if you don’t like profanity, you are posting in the wrong fucking place.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Let me lead with this: I’ve also grown tired of the samieness of adult animation genre. Rick & Morty was alright for a while, but that ship was basically sailed for me by the time other shows started jumping on the trend. I appreciate what R&M/Adult Swim did in opening up the field for animation to be taken more seriously in the pitch room, we’ll probably have an entire generation of decent media because of that, but we’ve kind of hit the trough of this first wave. That said, I liked Lower Decks a lot, because it kind of got rid of the high-stakes high-adventure selling point and zoomed in on the stakes and adventures that every day, non-galaxy class Starfleet crews can get into. It’s DS9 but with the adult animation vibe instead of the daytime TV soap opera vibe. I love the introduction of the Cali class ships that are just sort of your regular, everyday, multi-role ships. I love that the Cali fleet and the Cerritos are largely just focused on the normal, unglamorous stuff that has to happen in the background while the really cool people and ships do cool stuff in space.

    I also liked that the permission to be goofy and work with low stakes felt like it gave Star Trek the room it needs to breathe. It’s hard to do serious new Trek that meaningfully expands the canon while also respecting what came before, which, I think, is why we tend to get a higher ratio of prequels. It’s just easier and safer to stay within the bounds of the canon and tell Captain Pike’s story (I fucking love SNW, not dissing it). Case and point for new Trek, you’ve got Discovery, which I haven’t really enjoyed because it very much feels like it doesn’t have room to breathe and/or was written by focus groups. Maybe it gets better later, but I watched the first two episodes and found it less enjoyable than auditing lectures. LD’s characters and premise felt much more interesting by comparison, and I’ve really enjoyed the storytelling. It’s not perfect Trek, but I think it’s a show that largely knew itself and focused on trying to be the best version of what it was, and that’s what’s going to make it hard to beat.

  • MisterMoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I watched the first four episodes or so and what I noticed the most was how it seemed like every character was either yelling or speaking at high volume the whole time. It was exhausting. I really like R&M and I know this is from one of the key creatives on that show so it was super disappointing.

    • Lumidaub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Had the same initial reaction, then I gave it a second try and I was in by the end of season 1. I roll my eyes when people say “it gets better after a while” but Lower Decks does take ~5-6 episodes to find itself. (Does Evil AI Jeffrey Combs do anything for you?)

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Four episodes don’t define a single season (especially when it’s the first season) let alone an entire show with five of them.

    • Shark03@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      My dad felt the same, but he powered through a couple more episodes and it gets noticably better, and has now seen all of it except the most recent season. They even make a joke about loud and fast they used to speak at one point. So if you’re willing to, I’d say give it a go it really is worth it imo.