Gut dass ein Lastenrad keine Inspektionskosten und Wertverlust hat.

Ganz ohne den Vergleich in Frage stellen zu wollen, sollte man vielleicht bei den Parametern zumindest fair bleiben.

Und ein Lastenrad für 39€? Im Monat? Für 5 Jahre?

Weiteren Asylrechtsverschärfungen, wie etwa restriktiveren Regelungen für Rückführungen, der Kürzung von Sozialleistungen für Geflüchtete, der Absenkung von Schutzstandards, einer Ausweitung der sicheren Herkunftsstaaten, Schnellverfahren an Außengrenzen, der Unterbringung von Flüchtenden in Außengrenzlager sowie der Zurückweisung von Flüchtenden in vermeintlich sichere Drittstaaten dürfen weder die grünen Minister*innen in Bund und in den Ländern noch grüne Fraktionen zustimmen.«

Es ist aber auch einfach komisch sowas zu fordern, wenn der aktuelle Antrag der Grünen quasi genau das Gegenteil steht. Hier der Antrag.

Weniger “sichere Herkunftsländer”, bzw komplette Abschaffung des Begriffs. Keine Kürzung der Sozialleistungen. Längere Gültigkeit von Aufenthaltstitel und Arbeitsgenehmigungen. Mehr individuelle Betrachtung bei Ausweisungen.

Ich verstehe die Aufregung gerade nicht? Geht es darum dass sich die Grünen dafür aussprechen, dass massiv straffällig gewordene mit Asylstatus ausgewiesen werden können? Ist das wirklich eine unpopular Meinung in der Grünen Jugend?

As a German, it’s hard to imagine that the German rental model is an improvement to anything. It’s horrible. Private landlords honestly stuck even more than corporate ones. Lots of people who feel entitled to put whatever restrictions they want on tenants, regardless of the law. Racism/favorism are rampant, people are literally paying for appointments to just look at apartments and also to be favored in the selection process.

It’s bad.

“sofern internet vorhanden” da haben wir schon mal ein Problem. 5GB mobiles Volumen sind ach ell aufgebraucht und da kommt die Downloadfunktion von Spotify sehr gelegen. Die app ist auch einiges bequemer zu navigieren als Youtube im Browser :/

Interessant, schau ich mir gleich mal an!

Was wäre denn meine Alternative? Selbst wenn ich die ganze Musik die ich gerne höre lokal speichern würde, ist es trotzdem ziemlich cool auf Spotify einfach mal in was Neues reinzuhören.

Ich schätze mal damit ist gemeint, dass die Punkte die Menschen die Fleisch essen immer vorgeworfen werden, auch in der vegetarischen Ernährung enthalten sind. Tierquälerei, Umweltverschmutzung etc.

Der “payoff” bei einer rein pflanzlichen Ernährung wahre eben dass diese nahezu völlig eliminiert bzw. im Vergleich zur vegetarischen Ernährung massiv verringert werden.

As so one who gre up in Bremen: How dare you.

Im Berliner “Tatort” spielt Mark Waschke Kriminalhauptkommissar Robert Karow, der erstmals 2015 eine Sex mit einem Mann hatte (queer.de berichtete).

Wo bekomme ich so eine Sex her? Wollte die auch immer schon mal probieren.

As someone from northern Germany, I can confirm our food is straight up just better than that southern shit.

“Hi ich habe seit Tagen Symptome XYZ, könnte ich einen Termin bei ihnen bekommen?”

“Waren sie schon mal hier?”

“Nein, war ich nicht.”

“Sorry wir nehmen zur Zeit keine Neukund- äh Patienten auf.”

“Ich bin übrigens privatversichert.”

“Passts ihnen in ner halben Stunde?”

Hemelinger - Reicht doch 😓

Danke Brudi, top gemacht!

That’s literally what freedom of religion means though. To be able to express your religion in both public and private, without the state interfering. Every EU country has committed itself to the “EU Guidelines on the promotion and protection of freedom of religion or belief”. Freedom of religion does not mean that people are free to follow their religion behind closed doors or in places that you or the state allow them to practice it.

You left a whole bunch of other stuff out when it comes to the discussion about secular states.

Yes I didn’t quite the entire Wikipedia page, but I think my quote should already point out the incompatibility between banning religious clothing and committing yourself to secularism. Just to be clear: I brought up the idea of secularism in context of the state pushing religion on its people. I wouldn’t even use it as an argument in this case. The best argument to make here is that France as a member of the EU has committed itself to freedom of religion and thus should have no say in how people dress in their public and private life. There have been valid exceptions (such as banning covering your face at protests, banks etc.) for safety reasons, but this clearly doesn’t apply here.

Yes you’re right, imposing your views on others, does cross the line of a secular state. No one is asking that students have to cover their hair, it’s only demanded that they are allowed to do so. Equally crossing the line is the opposite, the state forcing it’s belief onto it’s people, by telling them they can’t express their religion in the form of religious clothing.

It goes beyond your private life and touches laws and values that are part of the state.

Apart from me mostly agreeing that the religious practices you mentioned suck, it doesn’t matter if it goes beyond your private life. Freedom of religion, me as you are free to express you religion in private **and public. ** You’re free to dislike it, but that’s what it is. Seeing people wearing Burkas, prayer beeds, crosses or whatever does not impact your freedom, even if it makes you uncomfortable. As I already mentioned, laws are a different issue. Of course religion is not above the law and of there are valid security concerns such as covering your face in a bank or a protest, there is no reason why the law should interfere with religion. A person wearing a dress at school, is definetly no such concern.

The abaya isn’t just a headscarf, though. It only leaves the face uncovered and I have seen kids who also additionally cover parts of their face with it.

I just googled it and it’s literally a fucking dress. Sure it’s often combined with a headscarf or (I guess this is what most people have a problem with, a Niqab), but how can you tell women (and often also men) not to wear a dress?

You’re right about the homeschooling (not so much on the private schools, but that’s not really relevant to the point), but that doesn’t stop religious radicals to pull their kids from schools so they can better indoctrinate the kids themselves. This was a common problem during the pandemic, where parents who didn’t agree with the state policies pulled their kids from school and it’s a common problem in counties where homeschooling is legal (like the US), where strictly religious or conservative parents pull their kids from school because they’re learning about gender identity and receive sex education.

Personally I think we need to do more to push back against conservatism, not less.

Something we agree on for once. I’m not religious and I hate to see religion being pushed on to kids. However, I’m a all a strong believer in democracy and the freedoms it gives us. That dies mean though, that we have responsibilities as well. You can’t pick and chose when to apply the rules we set up for a better world and when not to. The EU has committed itself to the “EU Guidelines on the promotion and protection of freedom of religion or belief” and we can’t throw that out of the window, because we don’t like how Muslim people dress.

That’s very interesting, I didn’t know that.

I wasn’t talking about Frances interpretation though, as I’m obviously not well informed on that. I was more thinking about the EU commitment to freedom of religion as stated in the “EU Guidelines on the promotion and protection of freedom of religion or belief”, in which all EU member states commit to protijg the freedom of religion in the EU (and even outside if possible, see OSCE).

Just as a small excerpt:

(b) the freedom to manifest one’s religion or belief, individually or in community with others, in public or private, through worship, observance, practice and teaching.

This includes the duty to rescind discriminatory legislation, implement legislation that protects freedom of religion or belief, and halt official practices that cause discrimination, as well as to protect people from discrimination by state and other influential actors, whether religious or non-religious

So the state has a responsibility to protect the freedom of religion, within it’s territory.

You actually have no idea what you’re talking about, sorry.

I’m glad we finally landed on Islam though, it shows that this law is supported by islamophobes and people like you are the perfect way to show this to the world.

Just a one minute Google search and you could have saved yourself from this absolutely embarrassing answer. Here let me do it for you:

A secular state is an idea pertaining to secularity, whereby a state is or purports to be officially neutral in matters of religion, supporting neither religion nor irreligion.[1] A secular state claims to treat all its citizens equally regardless of religion, and claims to avoid preferential treatment for a citizen based on their religious beliefs, affiliation or lack of either over those with other profiles.[2]

Prohibiting people from expressing their religions is strictly anti secular.

I can imagine that just fine and it’s horrible. I love in a country with a fuck ton of Muslim immigrants and I’m sure a lot of their children would prefer not to have to cover their hair (that’s what we’re talking about, not a burka as you describe it).

Yes it’s a powerful tool to keep kids under the influence of their parents religion. But taking away the symbols of that religion won’t make the kids atheist or magically take them out of the influence of their families. If you think that parents who enforce the strict rules of their religion because the kid can’t wear certain clothing at school, you are Truely delusional. Best case the lod doesn’t wear it in school, but still has to do so every other minute in their life. Worst case the parents pull their kids out of school, because the school threatens their influence. A lot of those kids are going to end up home schooled by their radical families or simply go to a private school, where such rules don’t exist. Neither is going to help the kid.

Said every authoritarian ever. So you don’t believe in freedom of religion and being able to express that?