• 0 Posts
  • 164 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 18th, 2023

help-circle
  • EatATaco@lemm.eetoWhite People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksWe coulda had Bernie...
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’m not even sure what you’re arguing anymore.

    Are you actually trying to say you did not say “They didn’t decide”? Because it’s right there, just a few posts up. Literally word for word.

    Are you really not smart enough to just go look back after I told you you said it? Or are you just grossly dishonest? Who are you lying for here? You can’t honestly believe you can gaslight, because it’s still right there for me to look at.




  • Sorry, you’ve proven otherwise.

    If you feel that way, then I’m sorry for giving the wrong impression. But I assure you it’s not the case.

    Otherwise, my reaction from now on will just be to repeatedly tell you to go away and stop harassing me.

    The better way to get me to stop responding to you is to simply not respond to me; I’m not going to respond to the same post over and over again until you respond. If we are having a back-and-forth, I would hardly call that “harassment.”


  • Lol, the reason it’s in quotes is because it’s quoting you.

    It’s in quotes because I was quoting you. If it had been in quotes when I quoted it from you, I would have done something like “‘They didn’t decide.’” Although I wouldn’t have even done that, because I’m honest and not trying to be right. I would have wondered why I misinterpreted it. You don’t strike me as all that dumb, but to not even go and look three posts up to see if you had quoted it seems incredibly dumb, especially if you are basing your whole argument on it.







  • Probably should have started with that.

    I did. At least pretty clearly when I said they were crowning themselves king rather than the POTUS king. Apparently, tho, I have to say I disagree with the ruling in every post or posters will assume that any disagreement with someone who claims the ruling is wrong must mean I think the ruling is correct. I guess I should have known this already tho.

    BTW, I never called you this.

    “Did you read the fucking dissent? That’s a sitting SC Justice saying that quote, not some arm chair IANAL basement dweller:”

    Funny to read you say my post, which doesn’t even remotely imply that I think the ruling was correct, implies that. . .but when you respond to my point, saying it is wrong, and throwing in “not some arm chair IANAL basement dweller,” that doesn’t imply you think that about me.

    I responded more directly since your ire seems to be pointed at me.

    You’re projecting here, as you were the one cursing at me and insulting people. I said nothing about you and I’m not really irked at all; I understand fully how partisan the average poster is and that any dissent is going to get piled on.


  • I never claimed anything was “rigged”

    You literally linked to two people saying it was rigged with the link text “they didn’t decide” and are now trying to argue that you never claimed it was rigged. This is amazing. You’ve got yourself so tied up trying to be right or trying not to be wrong, rather than figure out what’s right, that you don’t even know which way’s up anymore.



  • My dude, you are the one making claims.

    I used the word argument, not claims. Are you suggesting you aren’t making an argument?

    Again… Manufactured consent. Why would two senior politicians make claims and then backtrack upon them without admitting they were wrong in the first place?

    So, how exactly did they rig it? You’re making some vague claims, but can point to nothing.