LoadingReadyRun’s “watch+play” series could be worth a look. Not strict reviews, but entertaining videos based on terrible games.
As a software dev, any code library named SimpleWhatever or whose documentation contains the word “simply” anywhere makes me afraid.
Because they never are. They are a sign that whoever makes them thinks the subject is too hard to understand.
The end result is a code library that doesn’t make the inherent important hard parts organized and clear to work with, but obfuscates them.
HOOOONK HOOOONK HOOOONK! …if you know what I mean. ;)
You may be onto something.
The artist, Stonetoss, makes a career on catering to homophobia, transphobia, racism, antifeminism, all the nazi shit.
It is very much deliberate. He tends to use nazi dogwhistles to make his comics pass cursory censorship.
Sometimes he makes merely mildly hateful comics, like this. That is also a deliberate attempt to avoid censorship and spread the comics outside the nazi bubble. This is why he rebranded out of his previous comic “Red Panels” which was all nazi all the time and got banned everywhere.
Where does that headline phrasing come from? The study does not, and does not claim to, pinpoint anything for autism.
They use mice bred for hypersensitivity, and look at which parts of those mice’s brains can be suppressed to reduce measured sensitivity to heated floors and electric shock.
They use “mice models of autism” to get an indication of where to maybe start looking on the slim chance it turns out to be similar in humans.
The mouse model may turn out to be a different kind of hypersensitivity altogether. Human brains may wire hypersensitivity very differently. The observed results may be that the mice’s reactions are different instead of weaker. Etc…
It is valid science, but a long shot away from a long shot at being applicable for autism in humans.
Any action other than assisting the invaders would be an improvement.
Yes, the oppressed are eager to hurt people any way they can, and nobody can expect it to be any other way.
But still, launching long range missiles isn’t an impulse action. There are so many actors domestic and internationally to do production, procurement, installation, logistics, assembly, that we can assume someone high up has made a strategic decision based on expected outcome.
And the expected outcome is extremely obvious: a) zero tactical gains, and b) more excuses to ignore international pressure and hit Rafah even more brutally.
By “lived in a bush and hunted for his meals” he is referring to that one Sunday morning the owner forgot to fill his food bowl.
When in doubt, or fed up, I just go hard on “no subtext”.
There is a limit to how much I allow people to demand I decode their words for things they are not willing to say out loud.
A full 100% sounds weird. It means complete overlap with the ASD assessment which itself isn’t bulletproof. Weird like there were some mistakes in the data. E.g. all ASD pictures taken on the same day and getting a date timestamp, “ASD” written in the metadata or filename, or different light in different lab.
I didn’t see any immediate problems in the published paper, but if these were my results I’d be to worried to publish it.
Walk through social constructs as if they were air.
Obliterate objects by hyperfixating on them.
Drive villains mad by monologuing intensely at them about radio tower structural design history.
Well, my military experience says glass can feel safe from regular gun sounds.
We were using H&K AG3 with 7.62mm ammo, which is pretty strong as guns go. Both outdoor and indoor ranges. Bottles, windows, my glasses, windshields, mirrors, never had anything crack.
So it would have to be a very constructed setup and very brittle glass for it to break glass.
Well fuck my shit, what will the advertisers think?