Well obviously Geralt survives in the end of witcher 3 and most likely will be alive in 4, but what I meant is that they might kill him in the new game like they did with Vesemir in Witcher 3. They don’t need to, and I hope they don’t, but it would be kind of an easy plot device so there’s a chance. But at this point it’s just speculation anyway.
My main point was more in line that some people just don’t like change and that would be enough to make them oppose Ciri as the main character.
I can’t understand hating Ciri as a chracter, but I can understand being kind of a disappointed not having Geralt as a playable character.
If you consider it as an isolated game it doesn’t matter, but when you play three games as one character and then suddenly switch to another character it can feel kind of melancholic, in absence of a better word. Especially since now there’s a non-zero chance that they’ll kill Geralt in the new game.
But anyway, Ciri was an interesting character and those parts in Witcher 3 where you played as her were great.
That’s taking it too far. To beat the bad guy with water we just need good guys with water.
Even if Assad is defeated, the war is most likely far from over, the rebels are probably just going to end up fighting each other.
But the fertility rate has nothing to do with deaths.
May I introduce you to emojicode…
Dodgeball - a true underdog story
Could be, but at least when I try to google that artefact I get results which show 1200-1600.
CE would mean less than 2000 years, also I believe they ment 1200-1600 instead of 600.
As a fellow nevernude…
At this point I realize I’ve most likely ever only come across the mispronounced version…
I think Civ3 was the last where you could do this due to the crazy rng, and maybe even in the 4th as well.
You have indeed been mishearing it, since the lyrics say cats.
The target for 50m distance is larger than the one in the picture, also they don’t use air rifles for that.
The distance for air rifle and pistol is 10m
The distance in archery is 70m
Biden mixed up Zelensky and Putin in his speech.
Depends on the game, I have to admit most of my games are not fps or third person shooters, which I guess would have most issues. For strategy games it’s just so nice to see wider area, especially with some grand strategy games with plenty of UI elements.
Worst experience I’ve had has been with the occasional shooter games with bad support where the fov might look a bit strange. But if the game doesn’t support ultrawide resolutions, I don’t really care because then you just play with 16:9 resolution which would be the alternative anyway.
Sure if games are the only reason you buy an ultrawide monitor, then you might not get the full benefit.