fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 5 months agoLinguisticsmander.xyzimagemessage-square229fedilinkarrow-up11.33Karrow-down160
arrow-up11.27Karrow-down1imageLinguisticsmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square229fedilink
minus-squarepau_hanalinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·5 months agoIs there a better adjective you prefer to use to describe something that performs well?
minus-squarepsud@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months agoPerformant seems like a good word to use when you don’t want to admit the performance was poor
minus-squareElectricMachman@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·5 months agoI would probably say fast, efficient, high-performance, or optimal, depending on context. Or just “it performs well”. But I recognise I’m in the vast minority - just one of those new words that bugs me now but I’ll eventually accept
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·5 months agoEfficient and effective
Is there a better adjective you prefer to use to describe something that performs well?
Performant seems like a good word to use when you don’t want to admit the performance was poor
I would probably say fast, efficient, high-performance, or optimal, depending on context. Or just “it performs well”. But I recognise I’m in the vast minority - just one of those new words that bugs me now but I’ll eventually accept
Efficient and effective