It’s time to dust off those old CD binders.

  • Juvyn00b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    There’s still some use cases for sure. My 4 gig Garmin running watch (2.5 usable) might play flac but I want more than a few albums on it.

    • Laser
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Then again why would it need to be at 320 kbit for this kind of use case

      • Juvyn00b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        There’s no technical reason for 320 CBR but the space loss from a VBR ~224 encode to the CBR 320 is minimal compared to 320 vs flac around 1000. I do keep two copies of my collection for space reasons though - one in flac and one at 320. My phone is still a limiting factor to from a space perspective, I can’t store my entire collection on it in flac but I do choose to use it where I’m actively listening to an album through the weeks. The rest can be mp3 because it’s usually a single song that gets in my head.

        • Laser
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I don’t really have MP3-only use cases anymore, but back when I did, it was mostly where transparency was achieved rather easily, like listening to music on the go with… non-perfect headphones, and on those cases, I went with lame’s -V5 IIRC which is closer to 130 kbit/s or so. For higher quality, but not lossless (storage was still expensive back then) I used Musepack. But high bitrate MP3 was almost never needed.