A randomized preregistered field experiment finds that scientists are much more willing to review a paper by a Nobel laureate and to accept it than a paper by an unknown or anonymous author.

www.pnas.org

A randomized preregistered field experiment finds that scientists are much more willing to review a paper by a Nobel laureate and to accept it than a paper by an unknown or anonymous author.

www.pnas.org

GrassrootsReview@lemmy.mlM to Open Science Feed@lemmy.ml · 2 years ago

Just a moment...

www.pnas.org

You must log in or register to comment.

Chat

Open Science Feed@lemmy.ml

openscience@lemmy.ml

Create a post

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !openscience@lemmy.ml

Open science, open research or open scholarship, is an increasingly important discussion topic. However, it can be difficult to know where to go for information. This subreddit will collate the latest from the world of open science, including but not limited to open access, open data, open education, open peer review, and open source.

We use term science in the international sense: from the natural sciences to the humanities and everything in between.

We are also on

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

6 users / day
6 users / week
6 users / month
6 users / 6 months
4 local subscribers
611 subscribers
49 Posts
1 Comment
Modlog

mods:
GrassrootsReview@lemmy.ml