cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/859623

Since 2020, Next Generation Internet (NGI) programmes, part of European Commission’s Horizon programme, fund free software in Europe using a cascade funding mechanism. This year, according to the Horizon Europe working draft detailing funding programmes for 2025, we notice that Next Generation Internet is not mentioned any more as part of Cluster 4.

[…]

While the USA, China or Russia deploy huge public and private resources to develop software and infrastructure that massively capture private consumer data, the EU can’t afford this renunciation. Free and open source software, as supported by NGI since 2020, is by design the opposite of potential vectors for foreign interference. It lets us keep our data local and favors a community-wide economy and know-how, while allowing an international collaboration. This is all the more essential in the current geopolitical context: the challenge of technological sovereignty is central, and free software allows addressing it while acting for peace and sovereignty in the digital world as a whole.

    • themurphy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t think I get what you mean, when I only named consumer rights against companies and eco friendly laws?

      Can you specify why it’s bad and who the EU is trying to hurt with this?

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        2 months ago

        Work on your reading comprehension if you intend to pretend to act in good faith like this

    • best_username_ever@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      They don’t protect my privacy because they have a disadvantage though. That’s not at all what the GDPR is all about. Same for the other laws.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        GDPR etc. are the tip of the iceberg when it comes to EU regulations. Plenty of them apply to stuff where the EU is world-leading, also very far-reaching ones. Compared to REACH, GDPR is quite low-impact indeed.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s not the relation I meant. Rather having a long-term strategy because, compared to Russia and USA and anyone around, time works for the EU.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            If you can’t see how that’s a (small) puzzle piece of a long-term strategy then I can’t help you either.

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              This comment doesn’t seem to make sense both combined with mine and with your previous one, but OK!

              I don’t think I see less than many people here.