• el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      That sounds sensible on first thought…but it’s easy to find slurs that are for non-oppressed people’s.

      The French, for example.

      • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s not sensible in any way, you can have slurs for anyone.

        Someone not being oppressed doesn’t make them suddenly incapable of being oppressed or held down.

    • Voyajer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      A slur is any word that is used to insult someone based on their immutable characteristics (race, gender, sexuality, religion, ableness, etc.). There is NO requirement of oppression.

      • r3d0c@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        36
        ·
        5 months ago

        Extremely shallow analysis, certain words have a much different history than others and theres a lot of bad faith implications going on herea

        Would you say cracker and the nword are on the same level?

    • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Any word said with enough hatred is a slur

      Of course that being said I’ve never ever heard cis used like that either