• sanpo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is just some marketing bullshit.
    There is nothing I can see about these cables that’s in any way more repairable than any other cheap USB cable.

    They are also USB 2.0 without an e-marker chip, so their claims about “high speed” data transfer and “100W” charging speeds are dubious at best.

    • Successful_Try543
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Although, today we feel USB 2.0 is pretty slow, it is literally “Hi-Speed”, USB 3.x would be “SuperSpeed”.

      As thir connectors arent glued or molded to the cable, they can be replaced without damaging the cable by using a soldering iron. For a cheap USB cable, you would need to cut off the connector, remove the isolation and the solder a new connector to it.

      • GenosseFlosse
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        But why would I buy an expensive USB cable in 2025? They collect like lint in my drawers…

        • Successful_Try543
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          That’s another a different question. Not needing to buy a cable because you’ve already got one is one aspect of sustainability. However, in future, more people will have to buy cables (and chargers) as the will no longer be bundled with new smartphones.

          • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            And no one should be buying slow cables that they’re likely to trash anyway once they figure out their limitations…

            • Successful_Try543
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I have no idea why they only fulfill the USB 2.0 specification and not 3.x either, except using them for file transfer being a more rare use case than charging.

              • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                I have no doubt it’s because of the cost.

                You can get these connectors for less than 1€.
                If you order directly from China I’m sure they’ll be even cheaper.