They could have easily crammed the Steam Deck full of stuff to make it hard to use for piracy - locking down everything, making it usable only to play games you legitimately own, force you to go through who knows what hoops in order to play games on it. That’s what Nintendo or Apple or most other companies do.

But they didn’t, because they realized they didn’t have to. It’s 100% possible to put pirated games on the Steam Deck - in fact, it’s as easy as it could reasonably be. You copy it over, you wire it up to Steam, if it’s a non-Linux game you set it up with Proton or whatever else you want to use to run it, bam. You can now run it in Steam just as easily as a normal Steam game (usually.) If you want something similar to cloud saves you can even set up SyncThing for that.

But all of that is a lot of work, and after all that you still don’t have automatic updates, and some games won’t run this way for one reason or another even though they’ll run if you own them (usually, I assume, because of Steam Deck specific tweaks or install stuff that are only used when you’re running them on the Deck via the normal method.) Some of this you can work around but it’s even more hoops.

Whereas if you own a game it’s just push a button and play. They made legitimately owning a game more convenient than piracy, and they did it without relying on DRM or anything that restricts or annoys legitimate users at all - even if a game has a DRM-free GOG version, owning it on Steam will still make it easier to play on the Steam Deck.

  • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    they did it without relying on DRM

    Steam itself has some kind of DRM. You need to login to Steam to access the games you bought (sure there’s offline mode but then you can’t download your games, update or buy more, so it’s only temporary convenience). If Steam dies one day, so will your Steam games library.
    However, the service is great, so it’s not annoying.

    • corship@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      That is absolutely not correct.

      Steam policy is if valve shuts it down, they’ll give you enough time to download all the games and run them without drm.

      • Kazumara@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s a good policy. As long as the right people are still around to enforce it, it’s a little reassuring.

        • corship@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah I mean that’s a fundamental problem.

          We can a) trust people/companies as long as they don’t give us a reason to not trust them.

          Or b) we can never trust anyone but then this discussion is pointless anyway.

          • Kazumara@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            If there was no DRM we wouldn’t need to trust anyone to undo it.

            Or if that emergency release of the DRM was a contractual guarantee we had at point of purchase, we’d also need less trust.

      • drathvedro@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        There’s literally no way they could do that without being sued into ashes.