Moritz Körner, Member of the European Parliament, disclosed the decision on Twitter. Swedish publisher SVG said, “The question was removed at the last moment from Thursday’s ambassadorial meeting in Brussels”.

  • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Wasn’t this rejected once already? Perhaps if they wanted to do something useful, they should pass something that says that if something is majority disliked twice or something, then it should be withdrawn and not proposed again for at least 100 years.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They will keep trying again and again and again. The assault on privacy has been going on for decades and it will never stop.

      • Dasnap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’ve gotta defend for an infinite amount of time, but they’ve only gotta succeed once.

        • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yes. Technically, a similar vote could repeal the law just as easily but there is a history of governments not giving their power away easily; implementing it also sets a precedent and creates technical enforcement options for other governments willing to go through with something similar in the future, or for hackers to exploit because gov-rooted devices will remain in operation for years after the potential repeal.

    • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Better define some basic human rights as a core tenet and fire repeat offenders, because they are a danger to the population.