• De_Narm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Gonna be real honest here, I would have taken that in a heartbeat. It’s an open source project, I could disappear with my money and the project could be continued from a different fork without ads. The only thing you’re really sacrificing is your reputation and with enough money I don’t care.

    • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      and with enough money I don’t care.

      Most people are like you.

      Which is precisely why humanity will be just another of many dead end evolutionary cul-de-sacs in Earth’s natural history.

      I’ve come to peace with that, but this is a nice microcosm of the core reason. We can do better, we know better, but at the end of the day, almost all of us will just take the animalistic dopamine rush of winning.

      Live together or die alone. We choose the second one like breathing.

      If most humans were like Kempf (we’re not), we’d actually have a chance.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Almost the best of both worlds right?

      Creator gets a huge payout, well deserved. Users install VLC, see ads, exit, search web for “VLC ads”, see the fork, re-install having wasted 2-3 minutes total. Eventually “VLC Origin” is the only one anybody talks about.

      Those who can stomach ads don’t bother finding the ad-free version, and still use great software. Even the advertisers win.

      (This assumes no abusive telemetry / spyware.)

      • vinhill@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Could even use the money for new open source projects or for funding the VLC fork.