Game of the Year Award - Baldur’s Gate 3

VR Game of the Year Award - Labyrinthine

Labor of Love Award - Red Dead Redemption 2

Best Game on Steam Deck Award - Hogwarts Legacy

Better With Friends Award - Lethal Company

Outstanding Visual Style Award - Atomic Heart

Most Innovative Gameplay Award - Starfield

Best Game You Suck At Award - SIFU

Best Soundtrack Award - The Last of Us Part I

Outstanding Story-Rich Game Award - Baldur’s Gate 3

Sit Back and Relax Award - Dave the Diver

  • dlpkl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    When Starfield wins most innovative, that’s when you can disregard the rest.

    • li10@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sifu, TLOU and RDR2 aren’t even from 2023 as well…

      What a load of shite.

      • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        TLOU Part 1 was a 2023 release, even though it’s just a remake but at least I can let that slide. Even SIFU was a 2023 Steam release so I can let that slide. RDR2 is in a category that specifically built for games before 2023. What I can’t let slide is giving it the labor of love award. It hasn’t been touched since launch and the online component is a gong-show because of it’s bugs and cheaters. Even the singleplayer mode had a huge audio bug that affected many people (including myself) and the only work around was getting some guys script that you have to run before launching the game.

        It’s completely abandoned by Rockstar and does not deserve to come anywhere close to the “Labor of Love” award.

        • rainynight65@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah, I don’t know why RDR2 would be a) nominated in such a category and b) win it. There were a lot of nominations in that category to which ‘Labor of love’ was much more applicable.