• Dark_Dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Can’t we all researcher who is technically good at web servers start a opensource alternative to these paid services. I get that we need to publish to a renowned publisher, but we also decide together to publish to an alternative opensource option. This way the alternate opensource option also grows.

    • Salamander@mander.xyzM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Some time last year I learned of an example of such a project (peerreview on GitHub):

      The goal of this project was to create an open access “Peer Review” platform:


      Peer Review is an open access, reputation based scientific publishing system that has the potential to replace the journal system with a single, community run website. It is free to publish, free to access, and the plan is to support it with donations and (eventually, hopefully) institutional support.

      It allows academic authors to submit a draft of a paper for review by peers in their field, and then to publish it for public consumption once they are ready. It allows their peers to exercise post-publish quality control of papers by voting them up or down and posting public responses.


      I just looked it up now to see how it is going… And I am a bit saddened to find out that the developer decided to stop. The author has a blog in which he wrote about the project and about why he is not so optimistic about the prospects of crowd sourced peer review anymore: https://www.theroadgoeson.com/crowdsourcing-peer-review-probably-wont-work , and related posts referenced therein.

      It is only one opinion, but at least it is the opinion of someone who has thought about this some time and made a real effort towards the goal, so maybe you find some value from his perspective.

      Personally, I am still optimistic about this being possible. But that’s easy for me to say as I have not invested the effort!

    • No_Change_Just_Money@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean a paper is renowned if many people cute from it

      We could just try citing more free papers, whenever possible (as long as they still have peer review)

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Citation count is a shoddy metric for a paper’s quality. Not just because there’s citation cartels, but because the reason stuff gets cited is not contained in the metric. And then to top it all off as soon as a metric becomes a target, it ceases to be a metric.