• Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      None as far as I’m aware. The point is they make a profit so they have the same reason to avoid being regulated well enough.

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        None as far as I’m aware

        Wow, I guess that kind of makes that a totally irrelevant derailing of this post about chemical spills on railways.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          The chemical spills are because of lack of regulation. Agreed?

          That lack of regulation is because of for profit companies going as cheap as possible to make more money. Agreed?

          The federal government owns a for profit passenger line that is comparatively large to other private passenger lines in the us. Agreed?

          The federal government has a hand in regulating the same rails it has a stake in. Agreed?

          So how exactly are these things not relevant in relation to chemical spills due to lack of regulation… Like what?

          • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Sorry, “the government runs some passenger lines so it’s the government’s fault that private companies on privately owned rail regularly create environmental disasters” doesn’t check out.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          No that’s exactly the problem I think it is. If they’re mandated to turn a profit the federal government then has a perverse incentive to have weak regulation that allows greater profit margins.