• gandalf_der_12te@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Actually, I think it’s time to reveal, that to some people QM is actually pretty intuitive.

    It’s just that the masses and the news media don’t understand it, so they assume that nobody does. The particle worldview is deeply ingrained into many people’s brains, because it’s deeply useful to them on a day-to-day basis. If you loosen that requirement, then there’s literally nothing standing in your way to accept a wave-worldview.

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      What about the Copenhagen interpretation debate? What about the non-locality?

      These are academic debates, not people ones. Saying that quantum mechanic is intuitive is arrogant at best. You may have a perfect understanding of the current theory and how to use it, and you maybe comfortable using it everyday, but then you should be aware of the limits shouldn’t you?

      Otherwise it’s like alchemy.

      • gandalf_der_12te@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah ok, I get your input. The point is, that most of the arguments, that say that QM is “unintuitive”, boil down to the fact that some people are simply unwilling to accept that the world is “not made of particles”.

        Some people adhere to this worldview like to a religion. You cannot argue with religion. Therefore, for most people, there is little hope to come to terms with QM. However, I am saying, that if you “give up” on a particle worldview, then QM isn’t so super weird as lots of people always make it seam.

        Yeah, there’s some strange issues going on. But I’m saying, that a lot of these aren’t so mad to think about if you give up on your particle worldview. Coherence, for example, boils down to a system which isn’t simply described by “that atom goes there and this atom goes here”. It’s different, but consistent. It still reveals a consistent model with a measurable outcome. Just that this model is like taking public transport instead of riding your own car. Sometimes, you gotta mix things up to see the bigger picture.