• ynazuma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Still shi*

    Also, unless you live somewhere really weird, there is always another option to Starbucks

    Going to Starbucks says two things about you, I have no taste, I am too lazy to seek something better

    So yeah, seeing how many people actually drink that slop, makes those of us that don’t drink that slop proud of ourselves for not being tools

    • Punkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      “Another option” meaning what? Drive thru coffee? We do have Dunkin’s here, but none of them are drive-through. This may be different the further north you go, however.

      Going to Starbucks doesn’t mean I have to look down on people. Life’s too short for that. I judge people on the complexity of content of character, not “Oh look, a ‘basic bitch’ with Starbucks and Ugg boots. How droll.” Having “no taste” and “too lazy” are classist statements anyway, “no taste” according to what standard? Lazy compared to what? What standard are you adhering to to “be proud of not being a tool?” Anyway, independent of your personal judgement of people just trying to get through their day, they are going to keep doing it and not caring about any of the complexities.

      Starbucks is a service. You don’t have to like the service. I don’t get my legs waxed, but I don’t look down on those who do. Same thing. People are more than just their personal choices of our selective judgement. I recognize that Starbucks is popular, even if I don’t care for it. My reasons are basically I am cheap, and have to watch my sugar intake, so most of those milkshakes-posing-as-coffee are off limits. But if I am on a Starbucks run with someone, I am not going to patronize them like somehow I am some intellectual balloon rising above the mists of their complacency. Life is too short for that nonsense.