• atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well, if you did you’d have the whole D&D community after you. Some of them weren’t pleased that specific spell effects and conditions weren’t the same in game, and that was a hot topic in the community when the game first dropped. Kind of a damned if you do, damned if you don’t thing, so why break the game or disappoint players?

    • Butt Pirate@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      But they already crossed that line. There’s tons of shit from 5E that aren’t in BG3 and lots of mechanics work differently. You don’t need a rope to climb, you don’t need to find and secure and area to rest, there are no hit die. Shit, Cleric is missing like 7 entire domains.

      So what if they exclude a couple impossible to balance spells?

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I mean. There’s a balance to walk between changing things to make game play more accessible and fun in a video game setting, and making it broken and perhaps less fun to play.