Summary

The Colombian navy intercepted a semi-submersible carrying cocaine in the Pacific, uncovering a new smuggling route to Australia.

The vessel, capable of traveling thousands of miles without refueling, was part of a lucrative operation targeting Australia, where cocaine fetches six times the U.S. price.

This was the third such vessel seized, with maps confirming the route.

The operation, part of the multinational “Orion” initiative, seized 225 tonnes of cocaine and arrested over 400 people globally.

Colombian authorities highlighted links between South American and Oceanian crime networks.

  • funkyfarmington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    The first article about this said 2300 tons, the second, 1400, and this one 225?

    What is worse is the 2300 tons article implied that was seized from one sub. Do any of these dipshits know what a submarine hauling 2300 tons would look like? It would be as big as a container ship.

    At this rate we will learn its 2 dudes and a few k’s on a dingy!

    • yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      If the cartels had their cargoes insured for loss we would know exactly what it was worth. But as it is now, the value of drugs is limited only by the imagination of the police in charge.

      I’ve seen pigs weigh entire marijuana plants, terracotta-pot and all, then multiply that figure by a “street value” that’s 10X what I’ve ever paid for premium bud. I’m convinced that many drug dealers go their start after seeing these inflated values advertised on TV.

  • Laser
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Six times the price of coke in the US?

    I mean it makes sense because of logistics, but still.

    Never tried cocaine, but from what I heard it’s not really worth it, looking at price, effects on health, addiction potential etc while the high is just too short and not that great to begin with…

    People will now come out and say that proper coke is better but you can’t convince me. I’d rather try MDMA or DMT before touching coke

    • triptrapper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      Coke is absolutely overrated. It’s expensive, it doesn’t last very long, and even when it’s good it just feels like a high dose of Adderall. (I’ve done a lot of coke and taken a lot of Adderall.) In my experience, coke can be a party killer. People don’t want to share this expensive drug with everyone, so they separate from the group and do it in secret. And once I start, every 30 minutes I’m distracted and thinking about the next bump.

      MDMA and LSD are practically free compared to coke and alcohol. $10-20 and you’re set for the night.

      • Laser
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Issue with LSD is that it’s somewhat overwhelming, so not really something for parties, at least I can’t really imagine myself partying on it.

        2C-B on the other hand…

        • triptrapper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          It depends on the batch, and you’d want to try it first to see how strong it is. Some batches are definitely overwhelming, but others are just a very clear, euphoric high and perfect for parties.

          • Paragone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’ve a relative who began an unplanned LSD-trip while driving…

            I’ve been informed by a psychiatrist & medical-researcher ( my dad, but we … lived very separate lives, & didn’t get along ) that LSD’s stored in body-fat, so it can produce a flashback ANY time that THAT globule of fat gets metabolized…

            I’d prohibit people who’ve done LSD from EVER having a pilot’s license, & driver’s license … would have to be massively-justified.

            The others-on-the-road never consented to having LSD-users tripping-out in motor-vehicles, on the same road…

            We prohibit drunk-driving, shouldn’t we prohibit LSD-driving, too?

            & if LSD’s got inherent flashback capability, due to the way our biology can store it for later…

            shouldn’t that be considered in the public-safety law?

            Responsibility-archy isn’t identical with no-accountability/no-responsibility/narcissism’s-got-rights! paradigm, it’s true,

            but I’d rather that people either force-metabolize all their bodyfat, to remove LSD-flashback possibility, before getting their license, then just randomly lose-their-minds-chemically while piloting/driving…

            XOR, if they won’t eradicate the flashback-capability, then they don’t need to be piloting/driving, do they?

            _ /\ _

            • triptrapper@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I’m not a medical researcher, but I can tell you that the random LSD flashback, as you’re describing, is not evidence-based. As with many drugs, LSD releases glutamate and can trigger psychosis in people predisposed to psychosis. This can lead people to believe that LSD is somehow being stored in their body and activated later on. Something similar may be happening when people have a bad experience smoking weed and insist it was “laced” with another drug. LSD is processed by the liver and isn’t “stored” anywhere, unless you count blood during the several hours before it’s fully metabolized. Also, we already prohibit LSD-driving. Driving recklessly while under the influence of a substance can get you arrested and get your license revoked.

              Please be careful about spreading misinformation.

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Maybe it’s like a nostalgia / luxury thing, like people showing off that they have it whereas all the poors cannot afford it. Our monkey brains aren’t always optimizing for efficiency among equals:-).

    • deranger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think that math is fucked. Coke in the US is like 60-100 per gram, no way someone is paying 360-600 per gram in Australia.

      • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Idk anything about foreign coke prices but to play devils advocate, the US is ridiculously easy to get coke into from a logistics stand point. I agree both estimate ranges must be high but there is only so low the price could go to make it worth selling. I mean the cost to traverse across the fucking pacific compared to hoping across the gulf or digging a tunnel would have to be more than a 6x’s difference.