• Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    28 days ago

    Completely ignoring the infant mortality rates going up have you? What’s the matter? Doesn’t fit your narrative?

    • Kaboom@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      28 days ago

      255 more dead infants vs 50,000 saved. Magnitudes more have been saved than those lost.

      Fits my narrative pretty good.

      • Sundial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        And yet zero discussions on how to improve the quality of life of those 50,000 babies. How to make sure they are healthy and grow up to be functioning adults.

        You don’t care about the babies. You care about control. You’re disgusting.

        • Kaboom@reddthat.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          28 days ago

          So you think if life isn’t perfect, we should murder them? Do you not understand how evil that is?

          • Sundial@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            28 days ago

            You never cared about them. Don’t talk to me about evil. You’re pathetic.

            • Kaboom@reddthat.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              28 days ago

              Pathetic? Says the guy who thinks 255 is a bigger number than 50,000. You should go back to kindergarten.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        27 days ago

        What are your thoughts on sacrificing an individual for their organs? Could save 5+ lives with one sacrifice.

        Good trade? Any other moral issues beyond the math here?