Firefox is a great alternative to Google Chrome

  • Azdalen@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I can name a couple other reasons why FF is better:

    1. I get way more lower-level control via about:config over internals than chrome’s about:flags (i.e., adjust caches, buffers, networking strategies, GC thresholds, etc.)
    2. I can fully disable newer ad delivery mechanisms like Service Workers and WASM at a core level (NOTE: while these were initially touted as ways to speed up the internet, they unfortunately are used mostly as ad-blocking and tracking circumvention measures now; its also easy enough to re-enable them temporarily if a site uses one for legitimate reasons).
    3. Actual, no-kidding, site cannot override, auto-play blocking (via some about:config tweaks).

    With the newer FF versions they landed some very nice speedups, but with some of the tweaks i’ve made, basically FF be zoom’n now 😅

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    what i want to understand beyond just “did you know chrome bad” is why laymen are so insistent on it.

    so we can break it.

    • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      (primarily firefox user here) the Google account being able to be used as a universal login is sorta convenient (at the expense of privacy) Snapchat web (at least previously) requiring it to work (or at least it’s user agent) and an all in all slightly cleaner (more samey) experience.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        i mean if you login with google on any google site on firefox, it will also log you in to everything…

        and being cleaner is a matter of habit tbh, they look very similar

  • perishthethought@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 day ago

    I hate to say it but they’re preaching to the choir, as we say. The people who need to switch won’t read this great article.

    • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m pretty sure the number of Lemmy users who like Chrone is very small. It feels like most people here already use Firefox or some related browser.

    • limerod@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Well, you don’t need to switch. But, you can help your friends and family switch by setting up Firefox with Ublock-Origin.

      If they see the benefits. They will stick

  • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    2 days ago
    1. Browser diversity weakens Google’s grip on web development, and their position as a gatekeeper of the web.
  • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago
    1. It’s literally the only other decent option that is not a fork of the it or it’s one competitor.

    Unfortunately, both are funded by google. Yes, officially it’s just payments to keep the home page in firefox set to Google. But… without that Mozilla would collapse. Google’s got them by the low level components.

  • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The privacy bit is just as much absent as using chrome. You’d want a fork for either of the two for that.

    • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sorry but your argument is absolutely false. Even if Firefox is not the most private browser ever, it’s waaaay more private than Chrome. And you can even make it better with a couple of toggles.

      • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It definitely used to be different. But since the eu’s “cookie laws” as they’re called, google and mozilla worked together on a new approach.

  • Engywuck@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    1 reason I wont’ use Firefox or any gecko-based fork and I’ll keep using a Chromium fork, instead: I don’t want to support Mozilla.

    Enough.

    • megopie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 day ago

      But supporting Google is fine? Because if using any gecko fork is supporting Mozilla, then using any chrome fork is supporting Google.

      How is it different? Or how is Mozilla worse than Google?Or are you using safari or other webkit based browsers?