Attacks on two DTEK solar farms last spring is a good example. They destroyed many solar panels and some of the transformers, which step up voltage for long distances or step it down for use in homes. Replacing the transformers and swapping out destroyed panels allowed the farms, which generate 400 megawatts, to be back up in seven days.

Timchenko said an attack on a thermal generating station, which experienced a similar amount of damage, took three to four months to rebuild.

  • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Exactly!! Though I don’t understand why so many country’s and civilians are opposed to clean decentralised power generation such as solar, wind, thermal.

    The fact that you get to generate your own “free” power, and its less likely to fail in times of natural disaster.

    Its essentially “freedom” & “sticking it to the man” in one clean package. Its not what the media or propaganda calls “the green agenda”.

    The fact that it also has applications in better national security is a win win.

    Decentralised power generation makes you a american patriot! No a green hippy.

    • CMahaff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      In fairness, my understanding is that there are a lot of complications with adding distributed power to existing grids. That doesn’t mean it shouldn’t happen, just that there are engineering and safety challenges when power is coming from “everywhere” vs centrally.

      And of course, there’s a lot of energy companies lobbying against clean power sources as well.

      • 0x0@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        This, and the fact that solar and wind are intermittent so you always need a baseline provider, you can’t do it with “green energy” alone.