• Carmakazi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Because the big players there are not serious idealogues, they are paid a paltry sum through private channels to constantly spread Russian and Chinese disinformation in their larger psyop campaign against the West.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Highly doubtful. The amount of time, money, and effort would be much better spent elsewhere. Lemmy’s audience is very small.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah, more likely the actors on Lemmy are just useful idiots parroting propaganda points they’ve heard elsewhere.

      • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Time

        Basically none on the part of the handlers. Often this arrangement is handled by a private firm that doesn’t necessarily have to be Russian or Chinese, I have heard of one operating in Australia. The posters themselves are spending a lot of time, but they’re the ones selling it.

        Money

        Again, they’re not exactly paying these guys a living wage, and even if they were, it’s peanut crumbs for state-level actors.

        Effort

        A lot of people say that Lemmy is not worth the effort to demoralize because it’s too small, I say the effort is too small to not be worth the investment. I would even say that Lemmy users are self-selected for radicalization in some ways, broadly speaking they are fed up with corporate social media and corporatism in general.

        It’s also a somewhat important step to have a place they can speak unfiltered amongst themselves, no matter how small the clubhouse is. That’s where the real funky shit happens.

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I doubt those people are even aware of Lemmy, let alone hiring teams of people to post here. But regardless of how plausible it is, this is just speculation with no evidence behind it.

          That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

          • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            39 minutes ago

            commercial and propaganda bots have a tendency of taking small fora, and other sites with the ability to post, offline, as they overwhelm these super tiny venues, once their automated scrapers find them. There doesn’t have to be a team of people doing something other than monitoring bots.

            Also, I doubt anyone gets exposed to lemmy alone. It is very reasonable to believe many spend time on places worth using actual people to tailor their messaging to, and then carry that over here, and anywhere else they go. Point being, there no place so small that it becomes void of this.

    • obre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I guess commonplace decentralized pogroms like what happened to Jews and Roma throughout Europe historically

    • random@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      if everyone would mutually agree on killing certain people they could commit it without an institution ig

  • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    9 hours ago

    honestly Palestine/Hamas was trying to commit genocide too but they got uno reverse carded

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They are in fact trying the classical definition of genocide, the death of every Jew in Israel and the removal of the country.

      • Spectrism
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Removal of a country, to my knowledge, was never part of any definition of genocide. The term genocide has always referred to people, not states.

    • Chinese against Uighurs?

      China is fairly open that the camps do exist. We also have various credible government leaks describing the size of the operation.

      It should be noted that China maintains these are re-education camps intended as an anti-terrorism measure. Given their history, this is likely to be correct. To the west, re-educating to erase ones culture can be considered a cultural genocide. But since it doesn’t have the same effect as an ethnic genocide (eg mass killings) the reaction is a lot more muted.

      What China does deny is that the people inside these camps are used for labour, e.g. what is effectively slavery. There’s decent evidence to suggest this is the case, but the full nature of this is not really well-known afaik.

      Ukrainian Banderites in the Donbas? Exercise for the reader

      The only ones to ever claim that was Russia, and they never provided any credible evidence for it. It also conveniently came after some political developments in the rest of Ukraine didn’t go Russia’s way.

      The west still has free media outlets (the US less so, but in Europe the situation is better at least). Investigative journalists would definitely have jumped on a story like that if it were true, but they never managed to prove any of it.