schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to xkcd@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 hours agoxkcd #3015: D&D Combinatoricsxkcd.comexternal-linkmessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1251arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up1247arrow-down1external-linkxkcd #3015: D&D Combinatoricsxkcd.comschnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to xkcd@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 hours agomessage-square32fedilinkfile-text
Look, you can’t complain about this after giving us so many scenarios involving N locked chests and M unlabeled keys. https://explainxkcd.com/3015/
minus-squareThe Pantser@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down15·12 hours agoThis is where a LLM might come in handy. Just tell it the parameters and say roll random. I think D&D could really benefit from the LLM. Shouldn’t be too hard to just let it be the DM. That way everyone can be in the party 😂
minus-squareThinker@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down1·12 hours agoExcept an LLM has no way to roll anything random, it will just predict the most likely text for a random roll, which isn’t remotely the same thing.
minus-squareThe Pantser@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·11 hours agoWhy couldn’t they be paired with a true rng? They can reference outside sources.
This is where a LLM might come in handy. Just tell it the parameters and say roll random. I think D&D could really benefit from the LLM. Shouldn’t be too hard to just let it be the DM. That way everyone can be in the party 😂
Except an LLM has no way to roll anything random, it will just predict the most likely text for a random roll, which isn’t remotely the same thing.
Why couldn’t they be paired with a true rng? They can reference outside sources.