“OIG Investigators found that the DEA paid one airline employee tens of thousands of dollars over the past several years in proceeds from cash seized as a result of their tips. However, the vast majority of those airport seizures aren’t accompanied by criminal prosecutions. This has led to years of complaints from civil liberties groups that the DEA is abusing civil asset forfeiture—a practice that allows police to seize cash and other property suspected of being connected to criminal activity such as drug trafficking, even if the owner is never arrested or charged with a crime.”

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ah, I almost forgot about civil asset forfeiture… If the incoming regime ends up having any interest in appearances, and looking like they care about law and order, then keep an eye out for an increase in civil asset forfeiture cases.

        • HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Believe it or not there are number of services that you can pay in monero and get a payment in zelle, venmo or a money order.

          • BigFig@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            So no, you’re not paying IN monero, you’re exchanging through a middle man for a real currency, the USD. If the entity you are paying directly isn’t accepting the monopoly money, then it’s not the same thing

            • HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              30 days ago

              Semantics, but if saying it like that makes more sense to you then sure: I use middleman who accepts monopoly Money from me and pays my rent in “real” money for me.

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s not going to rise or fall that much in such a short amount of time. That’s for sure. With Monero, I generally prefer to use the 365-day simple moving average, and I found that normally it fluctuates within about 6% of that level. So that’s not a terrible fluctuation in either direction. Actually, if you have the money and patience, it would be a really good swing trade. Buy Monero when it is like 6% below the 365 day simple moving average. Wait for it to climb 6% above and then sell it all and do it again. But as I said, you would definitely need time because those swings can take several months.

          • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            I have less than zero interest in trading crypto. I think it’s all a net negative for the world with only dubious utility. The utility may improve, and something like monero may be what brings me on board, but I’m not there yet.

          • spongebue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Even if it does stabilize/is stable enough that the world shifts to it, what an interesting factoid that early adopters (who were lucky enough to pick the “right” crypto) would stand to benefit more than others.

            Sheesh. At least you stopped shilling this crap on gonewild

            • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              It actually works very well in those kinds of situations. People like that are constantly getting booted from the banking system and financial services. So crypto is a very good fit for that. Some of the very first people to use Bitcoin back in like 2010 and 2011 was WikiLeaks. After they were cut off from the Visa network, they were cut off from PayPal and other money transfer businesses and they were cut off from their bank accounts and they would have shut down had it not been for the funding they got through Bitcoin. There are a few industries that are perfectly legal that are just morally dubious to some people and therefore get kicked out of the banking system quite easily. Take a look at Operation Choke Point and Operation Choke Point 2.0.

              • spongebue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                I’m sure this will all be very convincing to get your average people to replace their existing bank account with that

                • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  You could take a look at the bank bail-ins in Cyprus in like 2013, where anybody with over $100,000 worth of assets had all their money taken from them by this Cyprus government in order to stabilize the banks. How would you feel if the equivalent of your 401k that you were relying on for retirement was just taken away to stabilize a failing bank? Sure, because your money helped stabilize the bank, you get stock in the bank. But who on earth would want stock in a just failed bank?

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          30 days ago

          Then I wonder how I’m still alive, as in January of 2025, will mark two years since I started buying my groceries every single month with it.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 month ago

    Here’s how I see this grift working:

    1. DEA agent gets info about cash mule coming across, but can’t get reward.

    2. Airport employee in on con gets a phone call from agent

    3. Report “tip” and gets reward

    4. Agent gets commission

    5. Rinse, repeat

    Follow the reward money and see who needs a corruption trial.

    • Skates@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      You think that’s somehow more likely than:

      1. Fucker with full access to your bags while you’re nowhere near them looks through your shit

      2. When they find a bag full of money, said fucker gets to legally take a percentage by just tipping off the DEA, instead of just robbing you and risking being caught

      ?

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    On the one hand, that’s really funny. On the other hand the libertarian assholes at Reason can get fucked.

    • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      30 days ago

      “You aren’t suspected of a crime, your money is. We need to take it into custody.”

      And then they get a new squad car two weeks later.

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Don’t worry. Under Trump the DEA will soon cease to exist, solving this problem.