Sync Ultra is a very reasonable $17 a YEAR. YouTube Premium is reaching that per MONTH. I have sync downloaded and it was the first thing I did. Thanks lj for the beautiful app.

[EDIT: That was a poor comparison, as pointed out in the comments. Leaving it for discussion sake.

There are many counterpoints and actually good discussion happening down below. Even if you don’t agree, thanks for showing me a different perspective!

If you want to support Sync, make sure to support the Lemmy Devs and your instance holders as well!

*This post was made early in the day before the update added the OTP option.]

  • Kokesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    First thing I did after opening the app was to look for the Pro (ultra) in-app purchase. But monhtly payments, no thank you.

    • Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m really confused why people feel this way. Can’t you just cancel it if you feel like it’s not worth it anymore?

      • limerod@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unless the app offers you cloud functions like email, cloud storage, multi-player gaming, or social media sites(lemmy, kbin, mastodon), etc. I see subscriptions as a no-go.

        • uberrice@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I usually hate subscriptions that try to squeeze you for money.

          In the case of sync, I see it as a recurring donation for LJ. 15 bucks is what I make in like 20 minutes as an engineer myself, so ‘paying’ 20 minutes of my salary to a developer of such an awesome app is no problem for me.

  • Acer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As someone from a third world country, fuck no. That shit is too expensive for me. Maybe to you privileged folk it’s reasonable. To me it’s nonsense.

    I feel shitty about it too since I was a long time sync pro user, I thought sync for lemmy would also have an affordable pro version but fuck me I guess

      • moitoi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You have countries where people don’t earn $1 a day. Once they cover their basic needs, $10 is like wining the lottery.

        It’s where Youtube does better. The price of premium is adapted to the local situation.

    • Overzeetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, but Adobe charges the very reasonable $600/yr and Autodesk a bargain $3000+ per year for their software, so clearly Sync must not be that good to only be asking $17 a year. I think I’ll look for something more professionally priced, instead.

  • 𝐘Ⓞz҉@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hate subscription based models. I wouldnt mind paying one-off but until then sorry sync , I am FOSSing

  • moitoi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The dev of sync have to split the ads and subscription revenue with the instances. It would be fair like this. He donating 30% of the revenue to them. He is paid and he pays for the usage of the instances.

    Youtube premium isn’t the same. Youtube itself has huge server, storage, bandwidth cost and premium is paying for it. The cost of the app is a fraction of it.

    On youtube, you have each second tons of new content. What I don’t have inside the app. The content comes from the instances. The equivalent would be paying a subscription to the instances.

    The creators receive a part of my subscription what isn’t the case here.

    With youtube premium, I have youtube music an additional service included.

    In my opinion, the first point is the fairest. The dev splits the revenues with the instances. It would be nearer to the Youtube model.