• T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      And again, as it’s worded it’s too fucking vague for people to gamble on. So no it’s no untrue. The threat is real because it’s in the books. Just because it hasn’t come to pass doesn’t mean it’s not a threat. I do believe murder is wrong. Never said it wasn’t. Abortion isn’t murder.

        • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          People are gambling on it every day hence the preventable deaths. Because doctors are worried about the very real threat of jail time or major fines. Because the laws on the books are poorly worded, without clear descriptions. Why are mothers dying more now than they were before. It’s pretty obvious that it coincided with the overturn of Roe, and the laws kicked back in.

          Murder is wrong because our social morality says it is, in certain contexts, other times it’s cheered on, and celebrated. I personally don’t believe people should be killing other people at all, and fetuses aren’t people, something that needs to be defined in a moral and legal context, see death. Many scientists agree that a fetus is incapable of survival on its own, and there has to be a boundary of what is acceptable. Do you agree that rape babies should be aborted?

            • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Until you provide arguments that aren’t strawman I won’t continue to engage. If you want a proper debate, argue in good faith.

              Also it’s the mother that is punished for rape. Another shit take from you.

                • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  You have brought up some that yes we’re not strawman, but when those were refuted, you continued to bring them up, just as I continued to bring up my points. No change would happen there. Then you strawman and strawman. So no I will not engage you anymore until you can argue what I said, not what you wanted me to say.