• T00l_shed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    It doesn’t exist except it’s on the law books. OK.

    It is an entirely false equivalence. Because a fetus isn’t a child until further in development.

      • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Great who determines it’s an “emergency”? With how poorly worded gop policies are it’s too much of a grey area to risk for many people when the punishment is jailtime or worse. A fetus is a fetus is it’s not an adolescent, more false equivalency. A fetus is a fetus, not a child.

          • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            No it’s not irrelevant. If it was the laws should be removed. As it stands they exist and are therefore pertinent.

            A fetus is a fetus, until it is a child it is a lump of cells and therefore no one should be forced to carry a fetus. It is not murder.

              • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                It’s relevant because it is. And now you’ve moved onto strawman fallacies. Try to argue in good faith :)

                  • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    I made my assertion with evidence (laws to punish abortions on the books) which you disregarded by saying no one has been charged (YET) so there was nothing to worry about. Then why will you not provide evidence (that we haven’t already discussed and disproved) to back up your claims?