• WraithGear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    But that is the explicit threat. That is what law makers are saying they are setting as precedent.

      • WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        There’s no guarantee they will be charged is not the same as there is a guarantee they will not be charged. And that is the issue, the hospitals were directly threatened by republicans with jail time, and contradictory statements, as proof when she reached out to get clarification from the governor even he noped out when it mattered. Also remember that the doctors do not run the hospital, administrators and bean counters do.

          • WraithGear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            There only has to be the threat. Because as long as hospitals are afraid to perform abortions the republicans win… well “win” in this case. We are just people arguing could have should have, when the hospital doctors recommended it, but the hospital with their lawyers and the fact they have been doing this as a profession was not as convinced as you seem to be.

            Besides, is your argument the hospital was out to kill this lady specifically?