Summary

Trump’s popular vote share has fallen below 50% to 49.94%, with Kamala Harris at 48.26%, narrowing his margin of victory.

Trump’s share of the popular vote is lower than Biden’s in 2020 (51.3%), Obama’s in 2012 (51.1%) and 2008 (52.9%), George W. Bush’s in 2004 (50.7%), George H.W. Bush’s in 1988 (53.2%), Reagan’s in 1984 (58.8%) and 1980 (50.7%), and Carter’s in 1976 (50.1%).

The 2024 election results highlight Trump’s narrow victory and the need for Democrats to address their mistakes and build a diverse working-class coalition.

The numbers also give Democrats a reason to push back on Trump’s mandate claims, noting most Americans did not vote for him.

    • soupuos@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      It could give people opportunities to vote for third parties without feeling like they’re throwing away their vote

      • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        34 minutes ago

        Okay so you go with what system?

        Let’s say the breakdown of votes looks the same as the Swedish breakdown. There will be more people that voted for a different candidate than the red one (Social Democrat).

        This then requires a run off system like france, or a ranked choice, which is also fine to propose, but you can’t hold up a visual of a parliament and say the system is so much better, when we talk about one singular office.

        The post compared two things that have different end goals

    • demesisx@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      FPTP applies to ALL political offices in a country that uses it.

      Using the presidency in this graphic would have been a very poor choice to display the difference between the two. Comparing 1 result with another result on a scale of 1 person would not have the pedagogical weight that the Congress graphic does.

      • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        Yes, and you abolish FPTP and now you elect a president how? I’m interested in your proposal, because it’s incomplete to say get rid of FPTP… Otherwise top vote getter, who gets maybe 30% of the vote leads the country which is also an abomination as 70% didn’t vote for that person.

        Abolishing FPTP requires doing something else on top of it, ranked choice or run off would be better than the highest count.