• riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Yet people keep making fun of Apple for putting the power button on the bottom.

    At least it works offline.

    • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      35 minutes ago

      Yeaaa…I’m switching to iPhone next time I need a new phone. And I’ve fully swapped over to Linux on all but my living room gaming machine. The gaming machine has no need for privacy if I’m just using steam and a controller. No mics or anything.

  • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This makes less than no sense, for $349 you can easily buy a computer that can stream a desktop, hell any computer capable of streaming another computer is inherently capable of offline work, this has absolutely no value add to anyone except Microsoft and not even that since people can make literally any other choice.

  • Ascend910@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    No matter what we said about it. There will be people who will eagerly put their mouth on Microsoft’s asshole, waiting to swallow any removed products that Microsoft shit out

  • Matt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    You can get an x86_64 mini pc for that same price. Or you can buy a used mid gaming rig for that same price.

  • LukácsFan1917@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This is getting closer to the meme about the Javascript-based streamed operating system.

    The only explanation I will now accept for how pointlessly laggy Windows can be is that Microsoft was deliberately increasing the latency to prepare customers for an online-only OS. Curse them.

  • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Why is it so expensive? You can buy a fully functioning laptop with a local windows install for way less.

    Even the new mac mini is $599 and that’s a full on computer with really good performance.

    • anon232@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The article mentions this is aimed at enterprises who are already probably doing something like this with vmware ESXi

      • Ptsf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Doubt it’ll ever catch on with anything except maybe the largest of orgs. You can just procure office task ready machines so cheaply these days, and Windows 365 is like $45/user/month. Far more than what we pay for windows licensing, user Cals, and office licensing all combined.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        It’s new and revolutionary in that it’s worthless because you can only run Microsoft shit on this and makes you lock yourself 100% in with a vendor notorious for not giving a single shit about customers

  • halendos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Nice, more e-waste… Also, if it’s just streaming from the cloud, how is it so expensive? Its on the same range as a steam deck.

    • Anivia
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      There is absolutely zero reason a thin client needs to cost this much, unless this has some seriously high-end multi-monitor capabilities

      Even a Raspberry Pi 5 is a capable thin client that can run 2 4k monitors