SSTF@lemmy.world to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 1 day agoIt's insidiouslemmy.worldimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1416arrow-down12
arrow-up1414arrow-down1imageIt's insidiouslemmy.worldSSTF@lemmy.world to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 1 day agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-squareRecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up20·edit-21 day agoPNG is lossless and its compression not well suited for photos. It doesn’t even have to be huge to get a photo PNG of that size.
minus-squareDeconceptualist@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-25 hours agoIt’s not TIFF. This isn’t NASA imagery. PNGs do alright on compression for photos. (at least I hope NASA hasn’t captured images of Quark)
minus-squarePhoenixz@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoPNG can zip but it’s lossless, joh can lose data, and the difference is very significant
minus-squareuser134450linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 hours agoHow would you make a lossy PNG? Just introduce errors randomly? That makes no sense.
minus-squarefrayedpickles@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-23 hours agoBy reading google or the wiki Process data so DEFLATE works more efficiently
PNG is lossless and its compression not well suited for photos. It doesn’t even have to be huge to get a photo PNG of that size.
It’s not TIFF. This isn’t NASA imagery. PNGs do alright on compression for photos.
(at least I hope NASA hasn’t captured images of Quark)
PNG can zip but it’s lossless, joh can lose data, and the difference is very significant
Can be lossless
How would you make a lossy PNG? Just introduce errors randomly? That makes no sense.
By reading google or the wiki
Process data so DEFLATE works more efficiently