CaractacusPotts@lemmy.caM to Harm reduction & Safe supply@lemmy.caEnglish · 1 month agoWant to tackle addiction? Legalise all drugswww.msn.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up111arrow-down14
arrow-up17arrow-down1external-linkWant to tackle addiction? Legalise all drugswww.msn.comCaractacusPotts@lemmy.caM to Harm reduction & Safe supply@lemmy.caEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·1 month agoUh… What? The underlying issue do not suddenly disappear when you legalize drugs.
minus-squarelemmyng@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoFrom the article: decriminalising drugs leads to a substantial drop in substance abuse and addiction rates. Countless studies have shown this. The issues do not disappear, but you lessen the stigma of addiction, and allow for official support, thus making the issues more manageable.
minus-squareDerisionConsulting@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoLegalization is not the same thing as decriminalization
minus-squareAuli@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 month agoExcept we also need to have those support mechanisms in place and we don’t. Also opioids are legal and lots of people start their addiction on pills subscribed by doctors.
minus-squarechuckleslord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoGiven true choice, most people will avoid the highly addicting substances. Removing the stigma, more people will get help. Sort of an immediate, double-benefit on ending addiction issues
minus-squareVictor Villas@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month ago The underlying issue do not suddenly disappear when you legalize drugs. That’s technically correct, even though “underlying issue” here should be plural because addiction is multifaceted. But I think no one is arguing that in the first place, the argument is that decriminalization has to be a part of the plan.
Uh… What? The underlying issue do not suddenly disappear when you legalize drugs.
From the article:
The issues do not disappear, but you lessen the stigma of addiction, and allow for official support, thus making the issues more manageable.
Legalization is not the same thing as decriminalization
Except we also need to have those support mechanisms in place and we don’t.
Also opioids are legal and lots of people start their addiction on pills subscribed by doctors.
Given true choice, most people will avoid the highly addicting substances. Removing the stigma, more people will get help. Sort of an immediate, double-benefit on ending addiction issues
That’s technically correct, even though “underlying issue” here should be plural because addiction is multifaceted.
But I think no one is arguing that in the first place, the argument is that decriminalization has to be a part of the plan.