PugJesus@lemmy.worldM to A Comm for Historymemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 hours ago"It's so much trouble remembering modern pronou-"lemmy.worldimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1164arrow-down112cross-posted to: roughromanmemes@lemmy.worldlinguistics_humor@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1152arrow-down1image"It's so much trouble remembering modern pronou-"lemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.worldM to A Comm for Historymemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 hours agomessage-square24fedilinkcross-posted to: roughromanmemes@lemmy.worldlinguistics_humor@sh.itjust.works
minus-squarerxin@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 hours ago they/them is what I hope we all eventually settle on as standard for NB gender identities. This part is the one I’m referring to. I’m not opposed to they/them — it’s good, but I don’t think it’s fair to reduce enbies to just “they/them”.
minus-squarePugJesus@lemmy.worldOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·46 minutes ago… why? Is that any more absurd than “reducing males to he/him” or “reducing females to she/her”? It’s language, not a campaign medal. You don’t need a separate example for every instance.
This part is the one I’m referring to. I’m not opposed to they/them — it’s good, but I don’t think it’s fair to reduce enbies to just “they/them”.
… why?
Is that any more absurd than “reducing males to he/him” or “reducing females to she/her”?
It’s language, not a campaign medal. You don’t need a separate example for every instance.